Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe White House Sends Troubling Signals About Its First Climate Test: Keystone XL
http://www.thenation.com/blog/172355/white-house-sends-troubling-signals-about-first-climate-test-keystone-xlDemonstrators rally against the Keystone XL pipeline in front of the White House on Nov. 6, 2011. (Reuters/Joshua Roberts.)
Addressing climate change wasquite remarkablythe most prominent policy vow President Obama made yesterday on the steps of the US Capitol Building. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that failure to do so would betray our children and future generations, he proclaimed.
The administrations resolve on this issue will be tested quickly, when the Keystone XL pipeline comes up for review once again. Obama denied approval for the project in January 2012 over concerns it would damage Nebraskas Ogalalla Aquifer, but allowed TransCanada to reapply for a permit with a different route, which it has done. A re-review of the project from the State Department may now be coming within the next few weeks.
Its notable that the White House initially denied the project based on the logic that it might be bad for certain Nebraskansnot that it would pump unacceptable levels of carbon pollution into the air. (Which it would: NASAs James Hansen has said its basically game over for climate change if the project goes ahead, and a new report released last week says its worse than we thoughtthe likely greenhouse gas emissions would be 13 percent higher than what the State Department originally estimated, according to the authors).
So will Obamas new and ostensibly bold direction on climate change mean denying the project again, this time making explicit the harmful greenhouse gas argument? Or will the project be approved now that the pipeline has been rerouted around that aquifer?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 797 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House Sends Troubling Signals About Its First Climate Test: Keystone XL (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2013
OP
newfie11
(8,159 posts)1. This oil will not stay in America
After making the pipeline journey ( possibly leaking along the way) it will then be refined by a stinky polluting refinery in Texas. After that it will be loaded on ships and sent to other countries.
This will not benefit the American people except for politicians on the take and big oil.
Meanwhile we are stuck with the mess, a gift that keeps on giving!
I'm a wreck over this thing.
Please, Mr. President, do not cave!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)3. The risks are huge and the rewards for the American masses are zero. nm