Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 07:58 AM Jan 2013

The White House Sends Troubling Signals About Its First Climate Test: Keystone XL

http://www.thenation.com/blog/172355/white-house-sends-troubling-signals-about-first-climate-test-keystone-xl


Demonstrators rally against the Keystone XL pipeline in front of the White House on Nov. 6, 2011. (Reuters/Joshua Roberts.)

Addressing climate change was—quite remarkably—the most prominent policy vow President Obama made yesterday on the steps of the US Capitol Building. “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” he proclaimed.

The administration’s resolve on this issue will be tested quickly, when the Keystone XL pipeline comes up for review once again. Obama denied approval for the project in January 2012 over concerns it would damage Nebraska’s Ogalalla Aquifer, but allowed TransCanada to reapply for a permit with a different route, which it has done. A re-review of the project from the State Department may now be coming within the next few weeks.

It’s notable that the White House initially denied the project based on the logic that it might be bad for certain Nebraskans—not that it would pump unacceptable levels of carbon pollution into the air. (Which it would: NASA’s James Hansen has said “it’s basically game over” for climate change if the project goes ahead, and a new report released last week says it’s worse than we thought—the likely greenhouse gas emissions would be 13 percent higher than what the State Department originally estimated, according to the authors).

So will Obama’s new and ostensibly bold direction on climate change mean denying the project again, this time making explicit the harmful greenhouse gas argument? Or will the project be approved now that the pipeline has been rerouted around that aquifer?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House Sends Troubling Signals About Its First Climate Test: Keystone XL (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2013 OP
This oil will not stay in America newfie11 Jan 2013 #1
K&R tilsammans Jan 2013 #2
The risks are huge and the rewards for the American masses are zero. nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #3

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
1. This oil will not stay in America
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 08:37 AM
Jan 2013

After making the pipeline journey ( possibly leaking along the way) it will then be refined by a stinky polluting refinery in Texas. After that it will be loaded on ships and sent to other countries.

This will not benefit the American people except for politicians on the take and big oil.
Meanwhile we are stuck with the mess, a gift that keeps on giving!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The White House Sends Tro...