Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEarth’s massive extinction: the story gets worse
http://www.ucalgary.ca/news/utoday/january6-2012/extinction[font face=Times,Times New Roman,Serif][font size=5]Earths massive extinction: the story gets worse[/font]
January 6, 2012
[font size=3]Scientists have uncovered a lot about the Earths greatest extinction event that took place 250 million years ago when rapid climate change wiped out nearly all marine species and a majority of those on land. Now, they have discovered a new culprit likely involved in the annihilation: an influx of mercury into the eco-system.
No one had ever looked to see if mercury was a potential culprit. This was a time of the greatest volcanic activity in Earths history and we know today that the largest source of mercury comes from volcanic eruptions, says Steve Grasby, adjunct professor, research scientist at Natural Resources Canada and co-author of a paper published in the journal Geology. We estimate that the mercury released then could have been up to 30 times greater than todays volcanic activity, making the event truly catastrophic.
Benoit Beauchamp, co-author and professor of geology, says this is the first time mercury has been linked to the cause of the massive extinction that took place during the end of the Permian, about 250 million years ago.
Geologists, including myself should be taking notes and taking another look at the other five big extinction events, he says.
[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G32596.1January 6, 2012
[font size=3]Scientists have uncovered a lot about the Earths greatest extinction event that took place 250 million years ago when rapid climate change wiped out nearly all marine species and a majority of those on land. Now, they have discovered a new culprit likely involved in the annihilation: an influx of mercury into the eco-system.
No one had ever looked to see if mercury was a potential culprit. This was a time of the greatest volcanic activity in Earths history and we know today that the largest source of mercury comes from volcanic eruptions, says Steve Grasby, adjunct professor, research scientist at Natural Resources Canada and co-author of a paper published in the journal Geology. We estimate that the mercury released then could have been up to 30 times greater than todays volcanic activity, making the event truly catastrophic.
Benoit Beauchamp, co-author and professor of geology, says this is the first time mercury has been linked to the cause of the massive extinction that took place during the end of the Permian, about 250 million years ago.
Geologists, including myself should be taking notes and taking another look at the other five big extinction events, he says.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1071 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Earth’s massive extinction: the story gets worse (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jan 2012
OP
How does this compare to the amount of mercury we emit today from coal plants? nt
NickB79
Jan 2012
#1
According to the EPA, human activity results in twice the mercury release of natural sources.
GliderGuider
Jan 2012
#3
NickB79
(19,233 posts)1. How does this compare to the amount of mercury we emit today from coal plants? nt
madokie
(51,076 posts)2. Are you really series!!!!?!
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)3. According to the EPA, human activity results in twice the mercury release of natural sources.
madokie
(51,076 posts)4. To cause extinction like this would take a lot of mercury in a short amount of time IMO
Maybe a volcano leading from a big deposit of mercury deep inside the earth, who knows. I do know that whatever it was wasn't or couldn't be compared to what we're doing today.
I'm anti-coal and anti-nuclear just so you know