Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumLos Angeles Aims To Be Coal-Free In 12 Years
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa intends to sign two agreements that will get the city off of coal-generated electricity entirely by 2025, according to reports flagged on Monday by the Sierra Club. Currently, the the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) relies on two coal-fired power plants Intermountain Power Plant in Delta, Utah and the Navajo Generating Station in northern Arizona for about 39 percent of its power.
Villaraigosa made the announcement last week at a green cities event sponsored by UCLAs Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, just days after the Forward On Climate rallies brought tens of thousands of people out across the country to protest both the Keystone XL pipeline and the general lack of policy momentum to fight climate change including 2,000 protestors in front of Los Angeles City Hall.
Well be out of Navajo, 2015. Intermountain looks like 2025, Villaraigosa said. It will be a big deal.
About 39 percent of L.A.s power comes from the two out-of-state coal plants now. The Navajo Generating Station in Arizona represents around a third of LAs coal-fired power; the Intermountain Power Plant in Utah produces about two-thirds of that power, which along with natural gas remains cheaper than less-polluting renewable energy like geothermal, solar and wind power.
Getting a city of 4 million people off of coal-generated electricity, especially when it accounts for almost 40 percent of their total energy supply, was always going to be a heavy lift. So its no surprise the original 2020 goal fell short. A late 2011 report from the LADWP recommended scaling back that target, and Villaraigosa eventually agreed to pursue 33 percent renewables by 2020.
At the same time, Los Angeles actually hit another one of its recent environmental goals: getting 20 percent of its power from renewable sources in 2010. That same LADWP report warned that success could be temporary, with renewables falling back to 13 percent of L.A.s portfolio in 2015 if further investments werent made. Hopefully, the $2.5 billion California voters decided to set aside in the 2012 elections for energy efficiency projects will help bring the complementary goal of more energy from renewables closer to realization.
.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/03/05/1675071/los-angeles-coal-2025/Villaraigosa made the announcement last week at a green cities event sponsored by UCLAs Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, just days after the Forward On Climate rallies brought tens of thousands of people out across the country to protest both the Keystone XL pipeline and the general lack of policy momentum to fight climate change including 2,000 protestors in front of Los Angeles City Hall.
Well be out of Navajo, 2015. Intermountain looks like 2025, Villaraigosa said. It will be a big deal.
About 39 percent of L.A.s power comes from the two out-of-state coal plants now. The Navajo Generating Station in Arizona represents around a third of LAs coal-fired power; the Intermountain Power Plant in Utah produces about two-thirds of that power, which along with natural gas remains cheaper than less-polluting renewable energy like geothermal, solar and wind power.
Getting a city of 4 million people off of coal-generated electricity, especially when it accounts for almost 40 percent of their total energy supply, was always going to be a heavy lift. So its no surprise the original 2020 goal fell short. A late 2011 report from the LADWP recommended scaling back that target, and Villaraigosa eventually agreed to pursue 33 percent renewables by 2020.
At the same time, Los Angeles actually hit another one of its recent environmental goals: getting 20 percent of its power from renewable sources in 2010. That same LADWP report warned that success could be temporary, with renewables falling back to 13 percent of L.A.s portfolio in 2015 if further investments werent made. Hopefully, the $2.5 billion California voters decided to set aside in the 2012 elections for energy efficiency projects will help bring the complementary goal of more energy from renewables closer to realization.
.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 619 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Los Angeles Aims To Be Coal-Free In 12 Years (Original Post)
octoberlib
Mar 2013
OP
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)1. Great news!
tinrobot
(10,890 posts)2. Very proud of my city.
Hope other cities follow suit.