Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 04:43 PM Mar 2013

Post-Fukushima, Japan's irradiated fish worry B.C. experts


--- from 2011 would love to know the latest numbers

http://www.straight.com/life/post-fukushima-japans-irradiated-fish-worry-bc-experts

In June, 56 percent of Japanese fish catches tested by the Japanese government were contaminated with ce-sium-137 and -134. (Both are human-made radioactive isotopes—produced through nuclear fission—of the element cesium.)

And 9.3 percent of the catches exceeded Japan’s official ceiling for cesium, which is 100 becquerels per kilogram (Bq/kg). (A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity equal to one nuclear disintegration per second.)

Radiation levels remain especially high in many species that Japan has exported to Canada in recent years, such as cod, sole, halibut, landlocked kokanee, carp, trout, and eel.

Of these species, cod, sole, and halibut, which are oceanic species, could also be fished by other nations that export their Pacific Ocean catch to Canada.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post-Fukushima, Japan's irradiated fish worry B.C. experts (Original Post) flamingdem Mar 2013 OP
Holy shit. That's far worse than I ever imagined it would be. Gregorian Mar 2013 #1
If you check DU there were posts last week regarding the levels not going down flamingdem Mar 2013 #2
There were "posts" that said that... but not facts. FBaggins Mar 2013 #4
Seriously? Then you need to adjust your imagination. FBaggins Mar 2013 #3

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
1. Holy shit. That's far worse than I ever imagined it would be.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:19 PM
Mar 2013

So we can probably expect a rise in cancer.


edit- oops, I see it's from 2011. Well, it would be interesting to see current numbers. I'll just leave my rec, even though this doesn't reflect on present contamination levels.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
2. If you check DU there were posts last week regarding the levels not going down
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:23 PM
Mar 2013

because the leaks continue.

Nothing so specific as this article, I'll post again if I find something.

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
4. There were "posts" that said that... but not facts.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:58 PM
Mar 2013

Not the "because" part.

The scientists gave a couple possibilities for why the level hasn't come down. "Continued leaks" is only one of them (and it doesn't make sense).

For someone who must have posted 100 statements including "bioaccumulation"... you don't seem to actually believe in it.

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
3. Seriously? Then you need to adjust your imagination.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:57 PM
Mar 2013

What would you imagine the bq/kg radiation rate is on a normal fish that's never exposed to any nuclear fission byproducts?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Post-Fukushima, Japan's i...