Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri May 3, 2013, 05:48 AM May 2013

Solar Is Going To Change The World Much Faster Than Anyone Expects

http://www.businessinsider.com/solar-is-about-to-get-cheaper-than-coal-2013-5

I’ve been getting into Solar lately – the fall in prices has been absolutely shocking over the last 2-4 years.

We are seeing price drops closer to 20% per year after several decades at 6% price drops per year.

6% year is a fantastic rate of decreases, but 20% is simply astonishing. 20% is an impressive number, but putting it into context will make your jaw drop with astonishment.

My calculations show that if solar maintains 5 more years at current 23% rates per year price drops, solar power will be cheaper than using existing coal plants. That’s right – it will be cheaper to build new solar plants than to use existing coal plants. It sounds absolutely crazy.



22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Solar Is Going To Change The World Much Faster Than Anyone Expects (Original Post) xchrom May 2013 OP
NO, it doesn't sound crazy at all Demeter May 2013 #1
g'morning miss demeter xchrom May 2013 #2
That graph is nuts and requires explanation. It makes no sense at all. That cliff is bizarre. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #3
Agreed, it makes no sense at all, given what information exists in the thread at this point. Thor_MN May 2013 #4
from the article bloomington-lib May 2013 #5
That "explanation" makes no sense either Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #9
Levelized Energy Cost is a thing, look it up Bradical79 May 2013 #14
But if the idea is to open eyes and change minds, then an off-putting graph is a clumsy tool Orrex May 2013 #15
LCOE is a standard metric used in the industry. FogerRox May 2013 #19
Read into the article for the explanation. TexasTowelie May 2013 #6
That shows a basic misunderstanding of finance. Nt naaman fletcher May 2013 #11
Capital cost? At a certain point the capital cost is recoupped. FogerRox May 2013 #20
I sure f&^*ing hope so! NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #7
I would think the operating cost of solar would make it the better choice alone liberal N proud May 2013 #8
Oh, but Duke Power will have to figure out a way to block the sun or djean111 May 2013 #10
A massive volcano The Wizard May 2013 #12
Yes, and engineered sulphation of the upper atmosphere is one way to cut back on Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #17
Solar Capital Named Top Dividend Stock With Insider Buying and 10.63% Yield (SLRC) Katashi_itto May 2013 #13
I kind of agree Yo_Mama May 2013 #16
K&R. Yes please! Overseas May 2013 #18
The reason for the recent solar drop was China flooding the market NickB79 May 2013 #21
Wow! This is only the 9,876,543,210th such bit of soothsaying. Basically, wishful... NNadir May 2013 #22
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. NO, it doesn't sound crazy at all
Fri May 3, 2013, 05:59 AM
May 2013

It's what the numbers have been saying from the start. If the subsidies to nuclear and coal were eliminated, including the unpaid environmental costs, the prices would already have been non-competitive years ago.

Good morning, fellow insomniac!

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
4. Agreed, it makes no sense at all, given what information exists in the thread at this point.
Fri May 3, 2013, 06:57 AM
May 2013

What event is going to occur in approximately 2020 that causes a stunning drop in cost per KWH in every form charted of power generation?

bloomington-lib

(946 posts)
5. from the article
Fri May 3, 2013, 06:59 AM
May 2013

"First, look at this paper showing the levelized cost levels for using Coal and Natural gas. In this chart, we can see the Levelized cost of electricity for different types of energy. Photovoltaic Solar has a high initial cost, but after paying for the system, the cost goes to the lowest among any source of energy. Great news, but the initial cost for solar is quite high. It’s high enough to make almost anyone not want to use solar"

Read more: http://monetaryrealism.com/solar-is-about-to-change-our-world/#ixzz2SE5L2KX1

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,994 posts)
9. That "explanation" makes no sense either
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:11 AM
May 2013

First, "levelized cost" is not explained and is just gooberized mumbo-jumbo.

Second, the assumption that all plants are capitalized at the same rate is also nonsense.

Third, the assumption that costs go from high steady state to low steady state assumes that steady state costs are realistic, which is more nonsense.

Fourth, there are many kinds of solar, and the OP and the article make the mistake of lumping them all together. They have different capital requirements and different economies of scale and different operating costs and different suitabilities of application.

There is a great point behind the original post, but there is so much smoke obscuring it that the OP should think all the issues and facts through carefully, write a clear post without bogus graphs, and start a new thread with it. (PM me if you do.) I am not going to make the OP's point for her or him.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
14. Levelized Energy Cost is a thing, look it up
Fri May 3, 2013, 08:03 AM
May 2013

I'm running out the door, but I just thought I'd let you know there is a formula and explanation. Should be able to find it with a google search.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
15. But if the idea is to open eyes and change minds, then an off-putting graph is a clumsy tool
Fri May 3, 2013, 08:08 AM
May 2013

Very glad for the good news all the same!

TexasTowelie

(112,124 posts)
6. Read into the article for the explanation.
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:02 AM
May 2013

The x axis denotes the number of years after the plant installation. There is a decrease after 20 years for all energy sources since that cost will have been paid off.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
8. I would think the operating cost of solar would make it the better choice alone
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:08 AM
May 2013

Bring down the investment and coal is gone!

West Virgina corporates will really have a conniption then. I can see the giant billboards now, scaring the people of West Virgina that the sun is going to close their coal mines.



 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
10. Oh, but Duke Power will have to figure out a way to block the sun or
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:16 AM
May 2013

buy up all the solar panels, because they make so very much money out of charging customers for non-existent and non-working nuclear plants. And remember, Nuclear Energy is GOOD for you! What can happen?

The Wizard

(12,541 posts)
12. A massive volcano
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:28 AM
May 2013

could block the Sun and make solar insufficient. The long term effects are lowering energy prices across the board and cleaner air and water. This will put more money in circulation and restore the middle class that big business has successfully eviscerated since Reagan and the loony concept of supply side economics seized control.
This and jailing corrupt bankers will go a long way to making the American dream a reality for the working class until the wealthy elites impose their will on the vast majority.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,994 posts)
17. Yes, and engineered sulphation of the upper atmosphere is one way to cut back on
Fri May 3, 2013, 09:24 AM
May 2013

Massive engineered sulphation of the upper atmosphere is one way to cut back on global warming while carbon sequestration catches up to reduce the CO2 / methane atmospheric concentrations.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
13. Solar Capital Named Top Dividend Stock With Insider Buying and 10.63% Yield (SLRC)
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:35 AM
May 2013
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dividendchannel/2012/11/23/solar-capital-named-top-dividend-stock-with-insider-buying-and-10-63-yield-slrc/

I just picked up 10k worth. Seems like an excellent investment alongside oil stocks. Yes, I have oil stocks. One always diversifies ones risk. Oil companies know how to survive and always prosper regardless.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
16. I kind of agree
Fri May 3, 2013, 08:22 AM
May 2013

And I don't think people have been taking either the benefits or the needed infrastructure seriously.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
21. The reason for the recent solar drop was China flooding the market
Fri May 3, 2013, 06:05 PM
May 2013

And now, the prices have fallen so much that some of their major solar businesses are going bankrupt as they can no longer make a profit: http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/21/news/suntech-solar-bankruptcy/index.html

China's Suntech Power has put its largest subsidiary into bankruptcy, a casualty of rampant oversupply in the solar industry and punishing sanctions levied on Chinese panel producers.

The bankruptcy filing, made in Jiangsu Province, marks the end of a long downward spiral for Suntech's Wuxi subsidiary, once a darling of the solar industry and one of the world's largest panel producers.

Declining prices for solar products and global trade spats have taken a toll on the nascent solar industry in recent years, leading to the failure of several firms heavily dependent on government support.


So, I think it is VERY unlikely that we'll see "solar maintain 5 more years at current 23% rates per year price drops", short of some technological breakthrough.

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
22. Wow! This is only the 9,876,543,210th such bit of soothsaying. Basically, wishful...
Fri May 3, 2013, 07:04 PM
May 2013

...thinking and denial are the main reason that the atmosphere is collapsing.

The solar industry would be interesting if, instead of even more soothsaying, it actually produced results.

It would have to supply 20% of the world's energy for about a decade just to make up for all the coal, gas, and oil burned by internet users to tell us how great it is, but it hasn't, it isn't and it won't.

There is nothing different about this case of the 9,986,543,210th prediction than there was in 1976, when the oil, gas and coal "consultant" Amory Lovins wrote the following.


Recent research suggests that a largely or wholly solar economy can be constructed in the United States with straightforward soft technologies that are now demonstrated and now economic or nearly economic."


(Amory "Suncor Consultant" Lovins, "ENERGY STRATEGY:
THE ROAD NOT TAKEN?" Foreign Affairs, Fall 1976, pp 60-96, citation from page 83)

Thirty-seven years later, the atmosphere is collapsing faster than ever, and what do have? More soothsaying that is saying exactly the same.

But don't worry, be happy. Churches have been predicting the coming of Jesus for two millennia, and no one's called them on it either.

Any strategy to address climate change is now useless. It's done. We're cooked.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar Is Going To Change ...