Wetlands more cost-effective in nutrient removal
http://news.aces.illinois.edu/news/wetlands-more-cost-effective-nutrient-removal[font face=Serif][font size=5]Wetlands more cost-effective in nutrient removal[/font]
Published September 17, 2013
[font size=3] URBANA, Ill. Removing nitrogen from the environment the natural way by creating a wetland is a long-term, nutrient-removal solution, more cost effective than upgrading a wastewater treatment plant, but it isnt necessarily socially beneficial to offer landowners multiple payments for the environmental services that flow from such wetlands, according to a study conducted at the University of Illinois.
In the areas we studied in Bureau County with small wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), it was much cheaper to do pollution control by installing just a few wetlands than it was to have the WWTPs do the upgrades that would be necessary to achieve the same thing, said U of I environmental economist Amy Ando.
Bureau County was selected for the simulation because it is an area that has waterways with heavy nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, and it is a rural area of the state but with some population density and a couple of WWTPs. In some ways, its a poster child for an environment where a program like this could work, Ando said. There is enough farmland to put in some wetlands, but there are also enough people contributing to the WWTPs that are generating nutrientsso there are parties on both sides that could trade with each other.
The study analyzed the amount of land needed to reduce nitrogen pollution, data on the costs of actual wetland restorations, and other factors such as the opportunity costs to the landowner from no longer farming the new wetland area.
[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12117