Shell made false claims about Niger delta oil pollution, says Amnesty

[Eugene]

Source: The Guardian

Shell made false claims about Niger delta oil pollution, says Amnesty

Report cites discrepancies between evidence of environmental
damage from Nigeria spills and claims made by oil company

John Vidal
theguardian.com, Thursday 7 November 2013 00.01 GMT

Amnesty International accuses Shell of false claims about its environmental impact in the Niger delta, saying that the oil company cannot be trusted and that there are "serious discrepancies" between the evidence of pollution and what Shell claims.

&quot Its) claims about its environmental impact in the Niger delta are frequently untrue. Shell has claimed that the oil spill investigations are sound when they are not, that sites are cleaned up when they are not, and that the company is transparent when, in reality, it maintains very tight control over every piece of information – deciding what to disclose and what to withhold," a report into oil spills in the Nigerian region says. "Shell is being disingenuous about the devastation caused by its Niger delta operations. Shell's claims about the oil spills cannot be trusted."

According to official figures, there are several hundred oil spills a year in the delta, many of which involve Shell pipelines. "Instead of being in the dock when there is an oil spill in Nigeria, Shell gets to act as judge and jury," says the Nobel prize-winning human rights organisation. "It is the communities that suffer a life sentence, with their land and livelihoods destroyed by the pollution. The Niger delta is the only place in the world where companies brazenly admit to massive oil pollution from their operations and claim it is not their fault. Almost anywhere else they would be challenged on why they have done so little to prevent it."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/nov/07/shell-oil-niger-delta-pollution-amnesty

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. This should not come as any great surprise.

I mean, these oil companies will do anything, and I do mean anything, to keep the oil (and the money) flowing.

[Nihil]

3. Got it in one!

> these oil companies will do anything, and I do mean anything, to keep
> the oil (and the money) flowing.

Shell in the Niger delta (+ Gulf of Mexico + Texas +...)
BP in the GoM (in conjunction with Transocean & Halliburton), Alaska, Texas, ...
Chevron in Brazil (in conjunction with Transocean again), Nigeria, Ecuador, Texas, ...
Exxon in Alaska, Australia, ...
Pemex in GoM, ...

The OP states "Shell is being disingenuous".
No, Shell is lying, cheating and killing ... being "disingenuous" is a kid avoiding
the blame for cookie crumbs around his mouth.

[adirondacker]

2. I wonder if this may be a reason for the increase in pirates in the region. nt

[HooptieWagon]

4. Lack of a functioning Govt contributes to both.

Just guessing....but I assume Shell has bought itself a corrupt and ineffective Govt that turns a blind eye to the pollution. And that weak Govt is either unable or unwilling to combat the pirates.