Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWanna buy a small modular reactor company?
BWC bailing out of SMRs?
Babcock & Wilcox to sell majority stake in mPower reactor venture
Jim Ferland, chief executive of Babcock & Wilcox, says the company remains committed to small modular nuclear reactors, but it thinks they can best be brought to the market with B&W as a minority partner.
John Downey
Senior Staff Writer-Charlotte Business Journal
The Babcock & Wilcox Co. (NYSE:BWC) plans to sell up to a 70 percent stake in its Generation mPower joint venture by mid-2014, reducing the Charlotte-based companys share of the small modular reactor manufacturing project to 20 percent.
And CEO Jim Ferland says he expects that will mean a sale of the intellectual property B&W has developed on the 180-megawatt reactor. He outlined the company's plan during a conference call with analysts Wednesday morning.
That may involve selling a majority stake to a single investor and selling smaller shares to strategic partners with expertise in different parts of the nuclear industry as Generation mPower files with federal regulators next year to get the new technology licensed...
Jim Ferland, chief executive of Babcock & Wilcox, says the company remains committed to small modular nuclear reactors, but it thinks they can best be brought to the market with B&W as a minority partner.
John Downey
Senior Staff Writer-Charlotte Business Journal
The Babcock & Wilcox Co. (NYSE:BWC) plans to sell up to a 70 percent stake in its Generation mPower joint venture by mid-2014, reducing the Charlotte-based companys share of the small modular reactor manufacturing project to 20 percent.
And CEO Jim Ferland says he expects that will mean a sale of the intellectual property B&W has developed on the 180-megawatt reactor. He outlined the company's plan during a conference call with analysts Wednesday morning.
That may involve selling a majority stake to a single investor and selling smaller shares to strategic partners with expertise in different parts of the nuclear industry as Generation mPower files with federal regulators next year to get the new technology licensed...
http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/power_city/2013/11/babcock-wilcox-looks-to-sell.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 956 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wanna buy a small modular reactor company? (Original Post)
kristopher
Nov 2013
OP
bananas
(27,509 posts)1. LOL - Rod Adams worked on that POS
This is the kind of "intellectual property" they're trying to sell:
http://theenergycollective.com/rodadams/53997/stop-worrying-about-spent-fuel-pool-fires-zirconium-tubes-do-not-burn
Stop Worrying About 'Spent' Fuel Pool Fires. Zirconium Tubes Do Not Burn
Posted March 20, 2011 by Rod Adams
The contents of this post were incorrect. I acknowledge the error and apologize.
Stop Worrying About 'Spent' Fuel Pool Fires. Zirconium Tubes Do Not Burn
Posted March 20, 2011 by Rod Adams
The contents of this post were incorrect. I acknowledge the error and apologize.
With that kind of incompetence, I wouldn't want to be anywhere near one of these things.
Who knows what else he and his fellow incompetents got wrong.
Discussed here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x288023
bananas
(27,509 posts)2. For those who don't know: IAEA Letter Confirms Spent Fuel Pool Fire At Fukushima 4 in 2011
Posted here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/101675165
http://nukefree.org/iaea-letter-confirms-pool-fire-fukushima-4-2011
IAEA Letter Confirms Pool Fire At Fukushima 4 in 2011
http://jornalggn.com.br/sites/default/files/documentos/letter_-_summary_of_reactor_unit_status_at_2011_15-march_daiichi_unit_4_radiation_utc1_2.pdf
IAEA Letter Confirms Pool Fire At Fukushima 4 in 2011
http://jornalggn.com.br/sites/default/files/documentos/letter_-_summary_of_reactor_unit_status_at_2011_15-march_daiichi_unit_4_radiation_utc1_2.pdf
The signed letter says:
IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE
Subject: Release of radioactivity from Unit 4 of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant
At 04:50 UTC on 15 March 2011 the IAEA was informed by the Japanese authorities that the spent
fuel storage pond at Unit 4 of the Daiichi nuclear power plant is on fire and radioactivity is being
released directly into the atmosphere. Dose rates up to 400 millisievert per hour have been reported
at the site. There is the possibility that the fire has been caused by a hydrogen explosion.
The IAEA has contacted the World Meteorological Organization and has asked that the results of
atmospheric models be circulated to all Member States.
The IAEA will issue further information as soon as it becomes available.
Günther Winkler
Emergency Response Manager
15-March-2011 05:10 UTC
IAEA Incident and Emergency Centre
International Atomic Energy Agency
INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE
Subject: Release of radioactivity from Unit 4 of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant
At 04:50 UTC on 15 March 2011 the IAEA was informed by the Japanese authorities that the spent
fuel storage pond at Unit 4 of the Daiichi nuclear power plant is on fire and radioactivity is being
released directly into the atmosphere. Dose rates up to 400 millisievert per hour have been reported
at the site. There is the possibility that the fire has been caused by a hydrogen explosion.
The IAEA has contacted the World Meteorological Organization and has asked that the results of
atmospheric models be circulated to all Member States.
The IAEA will issue further information as soon as it becomes available.
Günther Winkler
Emergency Response Manager
15-March-2011 05:10 UTC
IAEA Incident and Emergency Centre