Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:24 PM Feb 2012

Stabilisation after Fukushima cooling change


Water injection from the dark blue feedwater line was reduced, while the light blue core spray was increased by the same amount


Readings from the three sensors in the reactor vessel bottom head of Fukushima Daiichi 2

"Cooling of Fukushima Daiichi unit 2 has been upset by a change in injection rates, leading to a rise in temperature that Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) is working to gradually correct.

<>

Two of the three temperature sensors at the bottom of the reactor vessel edged up by about 2ºC. The third, however, rose by around 20ºC to hit 72.2 degrees 5.00am today. Tepco acted to stem this increase by injecting an extra cubic metre of water per hour through the feedwater line, and this stabilised the sensor at about 70ºC. It has since decreased to 68.5ºC, while the other two sensors were at a new low of around 41ºC.

<>

The majorty of unit 2's core is thought to have melted and slumped to the bottom of the reactor vessel, but its configuration there is unknown. What Tepco's experience indicates is that one portion of the deformed core relies on a certain flow from the feedwater pipe for cooling. While the core spray complements feedwater input and was significant in the push to bring the temperature below 100 degrees C, the two are apparently not interchangeable for one specific area of unit 2's core."

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Stabilisation_after_Fukushima_cooling_change_0702121.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stabilisation after Fukushima cooling change (Original Post) wtmusic Feb 2012 OP
It suggests Yo_Mama Feb 2012 #1
I'd say that it's likely that some fuel that was still above the support plates... FBaggins Feb 2012 #2
Possible Yo_Mama Feb 2012 #5
It was the result of a change by Tepco wtmusic Feb 2012 #6
But we were told the it was in cold shutdown!?!?!? Fledermaus Feb 2012 #3
It's the temperature of your morning coffee now wtmusic Feb 2012 #4
It still is. And still was during the temp spike. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #7

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
1. It suggests
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:31 PM
Feb 2012

That more of the core remains in the reactor vessel than previously believed, and perhaps more of it isn't in the bottom of the reactor, but globbed above.

An interesting sequence.

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
2. I'd say that it's likely that some fuel that was still above the support plates...
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 12:58 PM
Feb 2012

...has falled to the bottom of the RPV.

A far cry from the burningdowntothewatertablechinasyndrome!!!!!! that some still cling to.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
5. Possible
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:11 PM
Feb 2012

Still you'd expect the feedwater injection to work better than the spray in that case. Maybe a breakaway exposed a much more heated surface. Maybe this is a natural evolution and it was due to cool down anyway.

Whatever it was, it was clearly localized.

No matter how I turn this over in my head, I can't make it not end up being good news. Perhaps this is due to my limited understanding.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
6. It was the result of a change by Tepco
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:16 PM
Feb 2012

"This stability of unit 2 was disturbed for a few days, however, when Tepco tried to improve cooling further by tuning the rates of water injection. On 2 February, feedwater injection was reduced by two cubic metres per hour and the core spray was stepped up by the same amount."

They've switched back to the old way.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
7. It still is. And still was during the temp spike.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 01:49 PM
Feb 2012

These terms have meaning. It helps if you know what they mean.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Stabilisation after Fukus...