Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 07:29 PM Dec 2013

Revitalizing Our Forests

THIS Christmas season, I am roasting chestnuts by the fire. American chestnuts, to be exact. These nuts, once widespread, were almost wiped out by a fungal blight. For a century, most of the chestnuts we eat, like the sweet Castanea sativa variety, have been imported from Europe and Asia.

And yet, I have been enjoying American chestnuts for several years now, harvested from some trees that are now part of my forest of 600 acres in western Maine. I planted four seedlings in the spring of 1982. Beyond all my expectations, the trees thrived, and some are now 35 feet tall. I never would have imagined such success; it was a Hail Mary shot in the dark to see if they might grow in the forest where they were once so common.

The American chestnut was once considered the “king of the eastern forest.” It was a dominant species from Maine to Mississippi, accounting for 25 to 30 percent of the hardwoods, with trees capable of growing to a hundred feet in height and almost 16 feet in diameter. Then in the late 1800s nuts of a similar tree were imported from Asia, and some spores of Cryphonectria parasitica, a fungus that produces oxalic acid, which poisons and kills the tree, were inadvertently introduced as well. The Asian trees were immune to it, but the American trees were not. The fungus was discovered in the Bronx in 1904 and by 1950, it had done most of its damage. An estimated four billion trees were swept from our forests within a half century, and the American chestnut essentially disappeared.

Fewer than a hundred were left in its former range, along with scattered survivors elsewhere in the country. I had purchased my seedlings from a breeder in Michigan, but have no way for knowing for sure whether they are the genuine article, Castanea dentate, or whether they were at some point interbred with an Asian chestnut to give them resistance to the blight. My hopes for these seedlings were not high. The chestnut blight fungus can also live in northern red oaks, though it does not kill them. These oaks are common in my woods, and there is some evidence that American chestnuts planted near northern oaks will catch the fungus and die. And plenty of the other trees in my forest show signs of fungal infections.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/21/opinion/revitalizing-our-forests.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revitalizing Our Forests (Original Post) XemaSab Dec 2013 OP
Sounds promising n/t dtotire Dec 2013 #1
That's wonderful! LiberalEsto Dec 2013 #2
Chestnuts don't have male/female trees per se NickB79 Dec 2013 #3
For chestnut seedlings, I like Badgersett Nursery NickB79 Dec 2013 #4
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
2. That's wonderful!
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 10:10 PM
Dec 2013

We planted a pair of hybrid American-Asian chestnuts some years back, but they're not producing nuts.

I fear they might both be male. Every spring they put out these fuzzy strands about 8 inches long. After a while the strands fall to the ground and turn brown. Does that mean they are male trees?

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
3. Chestnuts don't have male/female trees per se
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 11:31 PM
Dec 2013

You do need at least two trees to cross-pollinate each other, but both trees are typically capable of both producing pollen and bearing nuts.

The issue is pollen sterility. When you cross Asian and American (and also European) chestnuts, the resulting hybrids start having pollination issues. Pollen-fertile cultivars are able to provide and receive functional pollen, while pollen-sterile cultivars are only able to receive pollen from pollen-fertile cultivars planted nearby. My memory is rusty, but I believe it has to do with chromosome mismatch (think something similar to donkey sterility). If you have two cultivars of the same variety, and both of them are pollen-sterile, you won't get any nuts. If you have one pollen-sterile and one pollen-fertile cultivar, only one tree will bear nuts.

Why do we still even bother growing pollen-sterile cultivars, you may ask? Some of the best nut-producing varieties are, unfortunately, also pollen-sterile. Nut orchards will often plant primarily pollen-sterile varieties, with a few pollen-fertile ones interspaced for fertilization. The pollen-fertile trees won't bear many nuts, but their non-production is more than offset by the heavy production from the pollen-sterile varieties.

It sounds like your trees are both pollen-sterile varieties. If you decide you want nuts, you could plant a pollen-fertile variety near them so that at least 2 of the 3 bear nuts. Good luck!

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
4. For chestnut seedlings, I like Badgersett Nursery
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 11:40 PM
Dec 2013
http://www.badgersett.com/

Minnesota-hardy hybrid chestnuts.

Burnt Ridge Nursery also has a good selection of hybrid chestnuts that I've found do well down to -20F: http://www.burntridgenursery.com/nutTrees/index_product.asp?dept=53&parent=

Their paper catalog lists far more than their website, BTW.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Revitalizing Our Forests