Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:02 AM Jan 2014

Big Oil’s War on the Sun

Remember “Peak Oil?”

Neither does anyone else.

That’s because the operational theory of why, at the turn of the century, Big Oil tightened its grip on the political system and used it to acquire as much of the “dwindling” resource as possible, often through proxy imperialism, has suddenly become irrelevant.

It’s not as if the fear of an impending, precipitous decline in oil production wasn’t an effective tool to massage markets, influence decision-makers and pique oil-thirsty populations into supporting petroleum-based wars, even if only subconsciously.

It was effective.

Rather, the planet is suddenly awash in oil. New discoveries in Africa, the long-awaited Caspian Sea oil and gas pipeline, expanding reserves in the US and the possibilities of the South China Sea have turned the earth’s ecosystem into a fountain of youthful exuberance for Big Oil.

http://www.laprogressive.com/big-oil-solar-power/

============================================================

The only people that want you to remember peak oil are the people who are selling you gold, silver and other overpriced commodities ....

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big Oil’s War on the Sun (Original Post) MindMover Jan 2014 OP
We're only awash in oil because we're not paying to get it cleanly or safely. Archaic Jan 2014 #1
I will try to highlight the obvious .... "BIG OILS WAR ON THE SUN" ............ MindMover Jan 2014 #2
I'm really having a hard time following you. Archaic Jan 2014 #3
I live on this planet and so far, I can only live on this planet for the foreseeable future ... MindMover Jan 2014 #4
Ok, sorry I wasted my time on this thread. Archaic Jan 2014 #5
Good luck ... with that expensive crapola ... when your sucking your air out of a hyperbaric chamber MindMover Jan 2014 #6
Maybe if you read the article it wouldn't be such a mystery. kristopher Jan 2014 #7
Thanks for your trying to enlighten, but I think that was a troll ... MindMover Jan 2014 #8
I must be really tired. Archaic Jan 2014 #9
Oh good grief. Peak oil has already happened. hunter Jan 2014 #10
I do not have enough time or the inclination to correct this post ... MindMover Jan 2014 #11
Peak oil is in the past. hunter Jan 2014 #12
You apparently aren't very good at that math thing you're touting if... kristopher Jan 2014 #13
Want me to PM you my phone number so you can call me? Just ask. hunter Jan 2014 #15
No, hunter. You are wrong. kristopher Jan 2014 #18
Ask. hunter Jan 2014 #19
Whoever you are beating your chest to, does not impress me... MindMover Jan 2014 #14
I offer you the same I offered Kristopher above. hunter Jan 2014 #16
Sorry, I charge by the quarter hour ... we are communicating enough already ... MindMover Jan 2014 #17
I use less fossil fuels than you. hunter Jan 2014 #20
Here ya go .... MindMover Jan 2014 #21

Archaic

(273 posts)
1. We're only awash in oil because we're not paying to get it cleanly or safely.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jan 2014

Ask the folks near the train derailment, or downwind of the flares in North Dakota. Or the ring of mercury around the Canadian tar sands.

Peak oil is not the end of oil. It's the end of cheap and easy to get oil. The oil we're "producing" now is subsidized by world governments not protecting their citizens from the pollution and future water issues.

Ask the folks in Lagos how well all this great oil wealth is helping them.

How many farmers couldn't irrigate this year because the oil companies used the money they should be paying to be clean, to buy water rights for fracking?



MindMover

(5,016 posts)
2. I will try to highlight the obvious .... "BIG OILS WAR ON THE SUN" ............
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:22 AM
Jan 2014

You are correct in your estimations, however if the greedy bastards that owned these companies were to care about the people and the planet, they could, would, and should use current technology to keep there filthy greedy carbon hungry business practices from ruining, yes, I said RUIN inspector clouseau... the planet ... in other words they could and should spend more MONEY to keep there mining of these carbons as clean as humanly possible ....

Archaic

(273 posts)
3. I'm really having a hard time following you.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:31 AM
Jan 2014

I agree that they should be forced to do what they do cleanly. I think that's what I said in my previous post. If they had to be clean, it would be expensive. If it were expensive, it wouldn't be done, and the cleaner alternatives would be where the investments focused.

So I'm not sure where the Inspector Clouseau shot comes from.


MindMover

(5,016 posts)
4. I live on this planet and so far, I can only live on this planet for the foreseeable future ...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:35 AM
Jan 2014

So your "expensive" rhyme is quite annoying and really makes me a little red in color ... see one of my previous posts for an explanation of red in color ...

The inspector shot comes from a very weird sense of humor that I inherited from a very dusty American GI .... sorry if you are tooooo young to enjoy it ...

Archaic

(273 posts)
5. Ok, sorry I wasted my time on this thread.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:38 AM
Jan 2014

It's like you've had 3 conversations before I walked in and am mad that I'm not up to speed on what you're talking about.

Go shit on somebody else.

Have a nice day.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
6. Good luck ... with that expensive crapola ... when your sucking your air out of a hyperbaric chamber
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:42 AM
Jan 2014

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
7. Maybe if you read the article it wouldn't be such a mystery.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jan 2014
...Every day, Big Oil’s executives, geologists, engineers, lobbyists and political cronies wake up to an existential threat. It cannot be destroyed by a proxy army. It cannot be bribed. And all the lobbying the world will never, ever keep it from rising each and every day, looming over them and challenging their every move.
Big Oil cannot hide from the Sun.

It turns out that Old Sol not only provides the essential energy that powers all life on earth, but—thanks to the ingenuity of some particularly troublesome human beings—its reliable light can be “transformed” into “usable electricity” through a “miracle device” called a “photovoltaic cell!”

Just imagine—what if people could stop burning oil and gas and even coal, and just use these miracle devices to transform Old Sol’s sunny disposition into the power needed to run just about everything?

Well, if you are one of the masters of the oil universe, you’ve probably lost a lot of sleep worrying about that very question. But worrying is not enough. Big Oil is taking action to stop the Sun’s onslaught on their energy monopoly. Big Oil is working hard to counter market-driven innovations that are not only making solar power more and more affordable, but also making solar power a progressively more attractive investment to Big Oil’s heretofore reliable benefactors on Wall Street.
In fact, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) recently issued a report touting the future of renewable energy as an investment. Suddenly, this is not about tree-hugging ethics. Now this is about the bottom line.

solar energy 408 Big Oils War on the SunAccording to BNEF, annual investment in new renewable power capacity is going to rise significantly between now and 2030. The report states: “The likeliest scenario implies a jump of 230%, to $630bn per year by 2030, driven by further improvements in the cost-competitiveness of wind and solar technologies relative to fossil fuel alternatives….”

But wait, there’s more...

http://www.laprogressive.com/big-oil-solar-power/


'Alternatively, we could go this route:
'Hybrid' nuclear plants could make a dent in carbon emissions
Combining nuclear with artificial geothermal, shale oil, or hydrogen production could help slow climate change, study shows.

David L. Chandler, MIT News Office

Many efforts to smooth out the variability of renewable energy sources — such as wind and solar power — have focused on batteries, which could fill gaps lasting hours or days.

But MIT’s Charles Forsberg has come up with a much more ambitious idea: He proposes marrying a nuclear powerplant with another energy system, which he argues could add up to much more than the sum of its parts. Forsberg, a research scientist in MIT’s Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, describes the proposals in a paper published in the November issue of the journal Energy Policy.

<snip>

The paper outlines three concepts, which Forsberg says could have potential in the coming decades. They involve pairing a nuclear plant with an artificial geothermal storage system, a hydrogen production plant, or a shale-oil recovery operation.

The last of these ideas would locate a nuclear plant near a deposit of oil shale — a type of deposit, technically known as kerogen, that has not been used to date as a source of petroleum. Heated steam from a nuclear plant, in enclosed pipes, heats the shale; the resulting oil can be pumped out by conventional means.

<snip>


http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/hybrid-nuclear-plants-carbon-emissions-1105.html

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
8. Thanks for your trying to enlighten, but I think that was a troll ...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 02:02 AM
Jan 2014

when they use the word expensive ... just highlights there addiction to the neo-liberal agenda ...

Archaic

(273 posts)
9. I must be really tired.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 02:18 AM
Jan 2014

I read the first one, and am great with it. I did read it before, and was great with then as well. I just re-read it and see clean power, and less oil, less natural gas.

When I read that 2nd one, I'm seeing let's build nuclear so we can produce oil. Which is absurd.

So I'm going to go to bed. Because I think I agree with both of you, but am getting a lot of negativity for doing so.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
10. Oh good grief. Peak oil has already happened.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 02:58 PM
Jan 2014

We're cruising along on difficult-to-extract-oil, natural gas liquids, and fuels largely synthesized from natural gas and tar using large inputs of coal generated electricity. Aren't we not clever monkeys to build things like tar sand mines and deep sea oil-platforms that cause catastrophic environmental damage and dump more carbon into the atmosphere per gallon of gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel than "sweet" oils ever did.

This is classic peak oil, as predicted.

Just because you are wealthy enough to own a car and fill the tank with gasoline every once and while doesn't mean peak oil isn't happening.

Hell, when I was a young man, gasoline was almost free. I was making $10 an hour and gasoline was less than a dollar a gallon. I could drive anywhere without thinking about the price of gas. My own young adult kids sure as hell don't live in that world. Why? Peak oil.

Unfortunately our addiction to fossil fuels has only made the fossil fuel industry more powerful.

As an aside, the natural gas industry loves the greenwash of solar and wind energy because these sources are intermittent and lucky to be producing their nameplate energy 15% of the time. The 85% (or more) gap in production is filled by conventional sources.

Efforts to replace fossil fuels or nuclear power with "alternative" energy have been spectacularly unsuccessful in the greater scheme of international economics.That numbers look good in one place, say California, is mostly a consequence of high energy heavy industry (steel mills or aluminum smelters, for example) moving elsewhere in the world, for example China.


MindMover

(5,016 posts)
11. I do not have enough time or the inclination to correct this post ...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 04:38 PM
Jan 2014

I will just say you are obfuscating for a purpose or you have been misled by your own lack of cognitive abilities....

Alternative energies and storage for these technologies have been increasing in there capabilities every day and will overtake conventional sources in due time .... and all your pooo poooing these advancements will not stop it ...

I will only question how long peak oil proponents will say we have reached peak oil ... is it 5 yrs, 10 yrs or 30 yrs ... because as long as I can remember (and I am an old bastardo) you guys have been saying we have reached our limit of oil, we have finite resources. .. now your line is whether we have reached the end of easy to reach oil, gas, coal or whatever, whats next ??... we have reached the end of fossil fuels ... ridiculous ... our planet will continue to replenish these supplies (FYI = human beings are a carbon based life form)... the obligation we have, is to have the willpower and strength to limit our usage and eventually stop altogether ... which we will accomplish ...

By the way, you forgot to mention Hawaii and most of the rest of Europe which is miles ahead of the USA in alternative energy production ...

hunter

(38,309 posts)
12. Peak oil is in the past.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jan 2014

Hawaii is a place I know a lot about, I have family living there. It's no kind of miracle. The electric power company is as regressive as they get, actively hostile toward solar energy. And all those cars and jet airliners swarming about the islands are powered by imported oil.

Germany replaced their nuclear power with coal, and greenwashed the mess in solar and wind, exempting giant corporations from the cost of these alternative energies, dumping much of the cost on those who could least afford it.

I do my best to "walk the walk." My wife and I have avoided commuting since the mid 'eighties, a combination of planning and and good fortune.

I am not a "consumer." I pretty much boycott everything. I'm posting this on an old Pentium III laptop that was trash. Total cost (not my labor) maybe $20. LXDE and Debian are awesome. Fuck Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe. I'm not buying their crap.

I live in a house that requires neither heat nor air conditioning. I fill the tank of my thirty year old car maybe ten times a year and I feel guilty about that too. I'm wearing clothes I bought in a thrift store. My garden is organic. I'm mostly a vegetarian and I don't eat fast food. My wife and I are university educated, with science degrees. We can do the math. (At one point in her career my wife taught calculus and medical statistics. I was just a lowly science teacher and medical lab worker bee.)

Always do the math. That's where the realities are.


kristopher

(29,798 posts)
13. You apparently aren't very good at that math thing you're touting if...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 06:16 PM
Jan 2014

...your efforts led to this conclusion:
"Germany replaced their nuclear power with coal, and greenwashed the mess in solar and wind"

Simply didn't happen; but it is a favorite line of bullshit from anti renewable crusaders.

As to peak oil being in the past, that too is bullpucky. We've been hearing that same refrain for decades. The only way you get to that conclusion is to redefine what "peak" and "oil" means. Now you have it so that all of the alternative sources of oil and alternatives to oil that the critics of the peak oil doomsday cult have always pointed to as the fundamental flaw in your claims just aren't part of your "math".

Great way to deal with the cognitive dissonance of dedicating your life to being so wrong for so long, I suppose.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
15. Want me to PM you my phone number so you can call me? Just ask.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jan 2014

I'm a Luddite without an answering machine and I hang up on machine calls, but persistent real people do eventually get through.

Let's see...

People I've known or met... Garett Hardin, Amory and Hunter Lovins, Helen Caldicott , slept on the floor of various prominent California anti-nuclear activists, hell, even slept with some in not-quite sexual ways, escaped with my virginity intact! I've worn a radiation badges as a temp worker, on my belt next to my gonads because as a young man I figured those were my most important parts. (My kids are healthy and awesome so I was probably right about this.)

I have funny stories about San Onofre, Humboldt, Diablo Canyon, Rancho Seco, UCLA research reactor (nice gemstones!), and dumpster diving General Dynamics and General Atomics.

The only way we're going to get rid of fossil fuels is to ban them. If you believe otherwise then you are just a shill for the fossil fuel industry, an industry which will be happy to "back up" the pathetically intermittent output of solar and wind energy.

Lovins is wrong. Efficiency doesn't matter at all, "smart networks" don't matter at all... Jevons paradox.

There are ways that alternative, non fossil fuel, non nuclear energy could work, especially in places like California or Hawaii that are very favorable for pumped water, off-natural-basin energy storage schemes, Salton Sea, anyone??? But these would be disruptive technologies so greenwash is currently the "most profitable" business. I won't do greenwash.

I don't "believe in" money or profits either, not within our current economic system, and I may die a homeless guy living on the streets in a cardboard box, but I'll always be myself. Not for sale, a very dangerous fellow when I don't know what I'm doing.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
18. No, hunter. You are wrong.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:51 PM
Jan 2014

In almost every single particular you are wrong. You were wrong about Germany replacing nuclear with coal and you are just as wrong with your litany of nonsense in the most recent post.

But hey, I'm sure that you have that special insight which is a seemingly ubiquitous gift of the hyper-qualified internet warrior. You know who I'm referring to; the ones that know those secret things everyone else is too stupid to realize - especially the people who actually have expertise in the field.

Jevons my ass.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
19. Ask.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 09:08 PM
Jan 2014

I'm such a Luddite I don't even have caller ID.

Absolute minimal California PUC land-line service.

Good for dialing 911 when I have to call the cops.

Graffiti no, guns and blood, yes.

It's 2014. I've run out of patience.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
14. Whoever you are beating your chest to, does not impress me...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jan 2014

I have a Doctorate in Psychology and my wife has a masters in nursing ... We have been renewing before renewing was even a word ...

The reality is that the math adds up to more oil then we can even count the barrels, and ships offshore have got there holds loaded with oil they cannot sell ...

We are finding everyday more oil, gas and coal ... unfortunately ... I do not enjoy the fact that the world is awash in carbon fuels and will be for many more centuries ...

We all need to get off this carbon fix and do renewables before hyperbaric chambers are on every street corner so that you can do your shopping of the next new item from China ....

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
17. Sorry, I charge by the quarter hour ... we are communicating enough already ...
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 08:50 PM
Jan 2014

And renewables are coming faster than you think or at this point can imagine ....

hunter

(38,309 posts)
20. I use less fossil fuels than you.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 09:20 PM
Jan 2014

I can live on the streets or in the wilderness and I have.

I win this game.

I don't feel good about that.




Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Big Oil’s War on the Sun