Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNuclear Plants and Nuclear Excuses: This is Getting Old
Nuclear Plants and Nuclear Excuses: This is Getting Old
Dave Lochbaum, director, Nuclear Safety Project
February 25, 2014
Fission Stories #157
The NRC originally licenses a nuclear power reactor to operate for 40 years. The NRC renews an operating license for an additional 20 years. An operating license gives the owner the right to operate the reactor, provided a plethora of regulatory requirements are met. Many of these regulatory requirements seek to ensure safety margins are maintained throughout the full term of the operating license rather than just until next week or next month.
Getting old is but one of the reasons safety margins can decrease, or disappear, over time. The bathtub curve shown below shows that wear-out failures can cause the overall failure rate to increase. As a result, considerable resources and attention are devoted to monitoring the condition of nuclear plant components and replacing or repairing them as required before aging degradation compromises safety margins.
That, at least, is the theory.
Earlier this year, the NRCs Operating Experience Branch released a report following its review of data from 2007 to 2011, inclusive. The NRC staff reviewed records such as findings by NRC inspectors and Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted by plant owners. Among the NRCs key findings:
- Since 2009, there is a notable increase in the number of inspection findings and LERs involving highly reliable components whose failure was attributed to age degradation after being in service for over 15 years.
- It is interesting to note that in more than 75 percent of the 105 datum that were reviewed, it was determined that the System, Structure, or Component (SSC) either exceeded its recommended service life or was effectively run-to-failure. Thus, it is reasonable to question the oversight effectiveness of the baseline inspection program in this area.
- About 40 percent of the 77 inspection findings were also Appendix B related findings, but only seven were cited against Criterion III, Design Control. Appendix B, Criterion III required licensees to verify or check the adequacy of design if safety-related equipment will remain in service beyond its qualified life. Thus, with greater than two-thirds of findings and events involving SSCs left in service well beyond expected service life, it is reasonable to question why NRC oversight programs are not more focused on aging management of active SSCs.
- Bear in mind that NRC inspectors and plant owners dont waste time and resources writing up age-related failures of lightbulbs in the warehouse and instead restrict their penmanship to failures of things that have a safety role to play in protecting workers and the public. Thus, the NRCs report identified the inability of plant owners to prevent age-related failures coupled with the NRCs inability to adequately enforce the regulatory requirements being violated.
That the NRC was inadequately enforcing regulatory requirements was documented in an audit report released on October 28, 2013, by the NRCs Office of the Inspector General (OIG)...
Dave Lochbaum, director, Nuclear Safety Project
February 25, 2014
Fission Stories #157
The NRC originally licenses a nuclear power reactor to operate for 40 years. The NRC renews an operating license for an additional 20 years. An operating license gives the owner the right to operate the reactor, provided a plethora of regulatory requirements are met. Many of these regulatory requirements seek to ensure safety margins are maintained throughout the full term of the operating license rather than just until next week or next month.
Getting old is but one of the reasons safety margins can decrease, or disappear, over time. The bathtub curve shown below shows that wear-out failures can cause the overall failure rate to increase. As a result, considerable resources and attention are devoted to monitoring the condition of nuclear plant components and replacing or repairing them as required before aging degradation compromises safety margins.
That, at least, is the theory.
Earlier this year, the NRCs Operating Experience Branch released a report following its review of data from 2007 to 2011, inclusive. The NRC staff reviewed records such as findings by NRC inspectors and Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted by plant owners. Among the NRCs key findings:
- Since 2009, there is a notable increase in the number of inspection findings and LERs involving highly reliable components whose failure was attributed to age degradation after being in service for over 15 years.
- It is interesting to note that in more than 75 percent of the 105 datum that were reviewed, it was determined that the System, Structure, or Component (SSC) either exceeded its recommended service life or was effectively run-to-failure. Thus, it is reasonable to question the oversight effectiveness of the baseline inspection program in this area.
- About 40 percent of the 77 inspection findings were also Appendix B related findings, but only seven were cited against Criterion III, Design Control. Appendix B, Criterion III required licensees to verify or check the adequacy of design if safety-related equipment will remain in service beyond its qualified life. Thus, with greater than two-thirds of findings and events involving SSCs left in service well beyond expected service life, it is reasonable to question why NRC oversight programs are not more focused on aging management of active SSCs.
- Bear in mind that NRC inspectors and plant owners dont waste time and resources writing up age-related failures of lightbulbs in the warehouse and instead restrict their penmanship to failures of things that have a safety role to play in protecting workers and the public. Thus, the NRCs report identified the inability of plant owners to prevent age-related failures coupled with the NRCs inability to adequately enforce the regulatory requirements being violated.
That the NRC was inadequately enforcing regulatory requirements was documented in an audit report released on October 28, 2013, by the NRCs Office of the Inspector General (OIG)...
http://allthingsnuclear.org/nuclear-plants-and-nuclear-excuses-this-is-getting-old/
Those bullet points bear repeating:
- Since 2009, there is a notable increase in the number of inspection findings and LERs involving highly reliable components whose failure was attributed to age degradation after being in service for over 15 years.
- It is interesting to note that in more than 75 percent of the 105 datum that were reviewed, it was determined that the System, Structure, or Component (SSC) either exceeded its recommended service life or was effectively run-to-failure. Thus, it is reasonable to question the oversight effectiveness of the baseline inspection program in this area.
- About 40 percent of the 77 inspection findings were also Appendix B related findings, but only seven were cited against Criterion III, Design Control. Appendix B, Criterion III required licensees to verify or check the adequacy of design if safety-related equipment will remain in service beyond its qualified life. Thus, with greater than two-thirds of findings and events involving SSCs left in service well beyond expected service life, it is reasonable to question why NRC oversight programs are not more focused on aging management of active SSCs.
- Bear in mind that NRC inspectors and plant owners dont waste time and resources writing up age-related failures of lightbulbs in the warehouse and instead restrict their penmanship to failures of things that have a safety role to play in protecting workers and the public. Thus, the NRCs report identified the inability of plant owners to prevent age-related failures coupled with the NRCs inability to adequately enforce the regulatory requirements being violated.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1123 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear Plants and Nuclear Excuses: This is Getting Old (Original Post)
kristopher
Mar 2014
OP
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)1. Indeed