Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHabitats for humanity: Why our cities need to be ecosystems, too
http://grist.org/cities/habitats-for-humanity-why-our-cities-need-to-be-ecosystems-too/?w=470&h=265&crop=1
The whole better-greener-more-awesome-cities movement has a problem: We havent found a good name for it. Sustainable cities! The term brings to mind such mundanity as energy audits and transit routes. Resilient cities! The notion requires us to consider, first, what horrible shit is coming down the pike. Carbon-neutral cities! Ugh. Dont get me started on that one.
Enter University of Virginia urban and environmental planning professor Tim Beatley with the solution, FINALLY. Here he comes, with the delivery. Wait for it
Biophilic cities.
Wait, come back! Its better than it sounds! Biophilic cities are places where animals and plants and other wild things weave through our everyday lives. The name comes from biophilia, E.O. Wilsons theory that humans have an innate connection to other living things, because we evolved alongside them. Its futurism with a paleo twist: An effort to create human habitat that can also host a menagerie of wild creatures and not just for their sake, but for ours.
The idea seems to be catching. In October, Beatley helped launch the Biophilic Cities Network, which includes eight cities worldwide, and there are more to come. Reducing your emissions, hitting people over the head about turning the lights off we need to do those things, Beatley says. But to motivate people I think we need that vision of where we want to go, not just how much less we want to consume of something.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 833 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Habitats for humanity: Why our cities need to be ecosystems, too (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2014
OP
hunter
(38,311 posts)1. Very interesting...
... says me, living in a house covered with vines, living within a dense suburb a bike ride away from our small city's downtown.
All we need now is far fewer automobiles, more public transportation, and small shops we can walk to. This could be accomplished with zoning changes.
Building upon what you've already got is usually the best solution.
cprise
(8,445 posts)2. Cars can't possibly be compatible with this concept
if wild animals are to be an important part of a biophillic city.
Bikes should be no problem, though.
hunter
(38,311 posts)3. I've been to Yosemite Valley in the summer. It's a city.
And it would be much nicer without the cars.
I've also seen coyotes walking casually among the tourists there. Many tourists don't seem to realize they are not dogs.