5 ways Paul Ryan’s budget screws the climate and environment
http://grist.org/politics/5-ways-paul-ryans-budget-screws-the-climate-and-environment/
?w=470&h=265&crop=1
***SNIP
Here are the five main ways Ryans plan would increase pollution, accelerate global warming, despoil public lands, and stymie Americans efforts to get out of their cars.
Kneecapping environmental regulation. The Path to Prosperity calls for enacting bills to roll back environmental regulatory authority, especially the EPAs planned regulations of CO2 from coal-fired power plants. The bills actual text devotes two of its 100 pages to whining about how President Obama hasnt been very nice to coal companies. Unfairly targeting the coal industry with costly and unachievable regulations will increase energy prices, disproportionately disadvantaging energy-intensive industries like manufacturing and construction, and will make life more difficult for millions of low-income and middle class families already struggling to pay their bills, Ryan asserts. He makes no mention, naturally, of the health effects of coal-burning and extraction on low-income families, nor of the jobs created by renewable energy industries, nor of the climate crisis.
Expanding fossil fuel use. Republicans are fond of inserting clauses to promote fossil fuel extraction into unrelated budget bills. Ryans budget is no exception. It refers to Republicans obsessive crush, Keystone XL, and other dirty energy projects, calling for legislation that frees the many commonsense energy and water projects currently trapped in complicated bureaucratic approval processes.
Defunding environmental programs. Ryan would drastically cut domestic discretionary spending overall. That would affect environmental spending everywhere from the EPA to national parks and other Interior Department programs. Anything addressing climate change seems to especially irritate Ryan. As The Hill notes, The blueprint hits spending for government-wide climate-change-related activities, mainly through cuts to federal agencies funds for overseas climate-change initiatives. It also targets the administrations clean technology and strategic climate funds, established in 2010, which provide foreign assistance to boost energy-efficient projects aimed at mitigating climate change. The Wilderness Society complains that Ryan would also cut spending for parks, public lands, and other conservation programs.