Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUsing Ukraine as a Pretext for more Climate Disruption (Naomi Klein)
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/pretext-climate-disruption.htmlUsing Ukraine as a Pretext for more Climate Disruption (Naomi Klein)
By Juan Cole | Apr. 12, 2014
(By Naomi Klein)
Published in The Guardian
The way to beat Vladimir Putin is to flood the European market with fracked-in-the-USA natural gas, or so the industry would have us believe. As part of escalating anti-Russian hysteria, two bills have been introduced into the US Congress one in the House of Representatives (H.R. 6), one in the Senate (S. 2083) that attempt to fast-track liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, all in the name of helping Europe to wean itself from Putins fossil fuels, and enhancing US national security.
According to Cory Gardner, the Republican congressman who introduced the House bill, opposing this legislation is like hanging up on a 911 call from our friends and allies. And that might be true as long as your friends and allies work at Chevron and Shell, and the emergency is the need to keep profits up amid dwindling supplies of conventional oil and gas.
For this ploy to work, its important not to look too closely at details. Like the fact that much of the gas probably wont make it to Europe because what the bills allow is for gas to be sold on the world market to any country belonging to the World Trade Organisation.
Or the fact that for years the industry has been selling the message that Americans must accept the risks to their land, water and air that come with hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in order to help their country achieve energy independence. And now, suddenly and slyly, the goal has been switched to energy security, which apparently means selling a temporary glut of fracked gas on the world market, thereby creating energy dependencies abroad.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 498 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Using Ukraine as a Pretext for more Climate Disruption (Naomi Klein) (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Apr 2014
OP
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)1. That is an understatement.
Annually a super tanker emits the equivalent of 50 million cars.
To fulfill Europe's requirement would need 400 such ships............which currently don't exist anyway. They would be in constant use crossing the Atlantic millions of times.
Shipping LPG to Europe may remove dependence on Russia but only to be replaced by dependence on the USA.
What a sick fucking joke.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)2. Must feed the oligarchs
What planet they think their going to live on I would like to know!