Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Thu May 22, 2014, 03:35 PM May 2014

The real budgetary emergency and the myth of "burnable carbon"

The real budgetary emergency and the myth of "burnable carbon"

How fast and how profoundly we act to stop climate change caused by human actions, and work to return to a safe climate, is perhaps the greatest challenge our species has ever faced, but are we facing up to what really needs to be done?

We have to come to terms with two key facts: practically speaking, there is no longer a "carbon budget" for burning fossil fuels while still achieving a two-degree Celsius (2°C) future; and the 2°C cap is now known to be dangerously too high.

Ian Dunlop, a former senior risk manager and oil and coal industry executive, says the management of catastrophic risk has to be very different from current processes. As serious, irreversible outcomes are likely, this demands very low probabilities of failure: management of catastrophic risk "must centre around contingency planning for high-impact and what were regarded as low-probability events, which unfortunately are now becoming more probable… Major, high-risk industrial operations, such as offshore oil exploration, provide a model, with detailed contingency planning and sequential barriers being put in place to prevent worst-case outcomes".

If a risk-averse (pro-safety) approach is applied – say, of less than 10% probability of exceeding the 2°C target – to carbon budgeting, there is simply no budget available, because it has already been used up. A study from The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research shows that "the combination of a 2°C warming target with high probability of success is now unreachable" using the current suite of policy measures, because the budget has expired.


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The real budgetary emergency and the myth of "burnable carbon" (Original Post) GliderGuider May 2014 OP
Another interesting graphic from the article: GliderGuider May 2014 #1
Strangelovian pscot May 2014 #2
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
1. Another interesting graphic from the article:
Thu May 22, 2014, 03:54 PM
May 2014

I've never seen the situation displayed this this clearly before. It seems we have already left the "known safe" climate zone.



It is now clear that the incremental-adjustment 2°C strategy has run out of time, if for no other reason than the "budget" for burning more fossil fuels is now zero, yet the global economy is still deeply committed to their continuing widespread use.

We all wish the incremental-adjustment 2°C strategy had worked, but it hasn't. It has now expired as a practical plan.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
2. Strangelovian
Thu May 22, 2014, 08:50 PM
May 2014

The scene that comes to mind is president Muffley asking Buck Turgidson if the planes will pause when they reach their fail safe points. They were holding at their fail safe points, says the General

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The real budgetary emerge...