Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,574 posts)
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:26 AM May 2014

NYT Editorial: WY Decision To Reject Science Standards Not Politics, But "Madness"

EDIT

The federal National Climate Assessment described frightening changes, including unusually severe and persistent droughts, already occurring in the United States. And two weeks ago, two groups of scientists reported that the West Antarctic ice sheet had begun to disintegrate irreversibly, a process that, over centuries, could cause a large and destructive rise in the oceans.

Despite all this, many leading politicians continue to dispute the science and resist any effort to regulate and reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas. Among the prominent deniers are two Floridians — Senator Marco Rubio and Gov. Rick Scott — whose state is greatly at risk from even modest and relatively short-term increases in sea levels.

Some of this is to be expected in a political season, when politicians will do almost anything to prey on the public’s fear of job losses. What is truly depressing is the news that Wyoming’s State Legislature has become the first in the nation to reject the new national science standards for schools, standards that include instruction on the human contribution to climate change.

The legislators’ action arose from various motives, including hostility to government regulation generally and, more specifically, any teaching that seems to threaten the coal, oil and natural gas industries that are important to Wyoming’s economy. But it seemed also to be a willful effort to leave a whole generation of children in the dark about climate science. This is more than standard-issue political posturing. It is madness.

EDIT/END

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/opinion/sunday/willful-ignorance-in-wyoming.html?_r=0

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Editorial: WY Decision To Reject Science Standards Not Politics, But "Madness" (Original Post) hatrack May 2014 OP
Well, when the coniferous trees in Yellowstone all turn red and die... truebrit71 May 2014 #1
kick, kick, kick..... daleanime May 2014 #2
 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
1. Well, when the coniferous trees in Yellowstone all turn red and die...
Tue May 27, 2014, 01:06 PM
May 2014

...the Grand Tetons are free of snow...and the animal population disappears, would someone from a neighbouring state like to fill them in as to why??

No? I wouldn't either, ignorant asswipes..

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»NYT Editorial: WY Decisi...