Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,578 posts)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:37 PM Jul 2014

Mike Simpson (R-ID) Wants Exemption To Arsenic Standards In Drinking Water - Too Expensive, You See

EDIT

This week, Simpson was in the spotlight after a Center for Public Integrity report concluded he was the representative who stalled a scientific review of arsenic at the EPA. The review was necessary for the EPA to ban herbicides containing arsenic. ”All evidence from the Center’s investigation pointed to one congressman: Mike Simpson of Idaho,” the report said. Simpson’s office told The Daily Beast they were short-staffed this week, and could not confirm or deny that the congressman worked to stall the arsenic review.

Simpson’s explanations don’t fly with water quality advocates, who note the deleterious public health effects that could come from not removing enough arsenic from water. Arsenic cause cancer, nervous system damage, and diabetes. “There is no safe level of exposure to a genotoxic chemical—any exposure may incur some risk because genetic errors introduced in a single cell following arsenic exposure can cascade into cancer, birth defects and developmental damage,” said Dr. Kathleen Burns, director of Sciencecorps, a network of health professionals focused on environmental and occupational health.

Burns also argues that removing arsenic is an issue of racial justice. Arsenic can also cause cardiovascular disease, which African-Americans have greater genetic susceptibility for, she said. The question should be how to pay for water treatment in rural areas, advocates say, not to allow more toxic chemicals there due to budget restraints.

“We never, ever question that cost is an issue. But we could never concede that cost is a reason to [lower] drinking water standards,” said Lynn Thorp, a senior policy specialist at Clean Water Action.

EDIT

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/07/the-congressman-fighting-for-more-arsenic-in-drinking-water.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Simpson (R-ID) Wants Exemption To Arsenic Standards In Drinking Water - Too Expensive, You See (Original Post) hatrack Jul 2014 OP
It is cheaper to just let people die... TreasonousBastard Jul 2014 #1
His will drink bottled. He doen 't give half a shit about how your's and mine fare. Ed Suspicious Jul 2014 #2
Thank you. nt littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #3

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. It is cheaper to just let people die...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jul 2014

I'll give him that.

But does he really want his kids to drink arsenic-laden water just to save a buck?

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
2. His will drink bottled. He doen 't give half a shit about how your's and mine fare.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:52 PM
Jul 2014

Actually he'd probably prefer us buy bottled. Does he take any financing from Nestle? That would tell us a lot about his ulterior motives.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Mike Simpson (R-ID) Wants...