Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 09:40 AM Oct 2014

UW fusion reactor concept could be cheaper than coal

http://www.washington.edu/news/2014/10/08/uw-fusion-reactor-concept-could-be-cheaper-than-coal/
[font face=Serif]October 8, 2014
[font size=5]UW fusion reactor concept could be cheaper than coal[/font]
Michelle Ma
News and Information
[font size=4]Fusion energy almost sounds too good to be true – zero greenhouse gas emissions, no long-lived radioactive waste, a nearly unlimited fuel supply.[/font]

[font size=2]U of Washington

The UW’s current fusion experiment, HIT-SI3. It is about one-tenth the size of the power-producing dynomak concept.[/font]

[font size=3]Perhaps the biggest roadblock to adopting fusion energy is that the economics haven’t penciled out. Fusion power designs aren’t cheap enough to outperform systems that use fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas.

University of Washington engineers hope to change that. They have designed a concept for a fusion reactor that, when scaled up to the size of a large electrical power plant, would rival costs for a new coal-fired plant with similar electrical output.

The team published its reactor design and cost-analysis findings last spring and will present results Oct. 17 at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Fusion Energy Conference in St. Petersburg, Russia.

“Right now, this design has the greatest potential of producing economical fusion power of any current concept,” said Thomas Jarboe, a UW professor of aeronautics and astronautics and an adjunct professor in physics.

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.072
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UW fusion reactor concept could be cheaper than coal (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Oct 2014 OP
I first heard about fusion in 1970 OnlinePoker Oct 2014 #1
I guess it's pointless to pursue it then… OKIsItJustMe Oct 2014 #2
Did I say that? OnlinePoker Oct 2014 #5
I keep my fingers crossed for Fusion madokie Oct 2014 #3
How many fusion projects does UW have? bananas Oct 2014 #4

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
1. I first heard about fusion in 1970
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 10:58 AM
Oct 2014

I was 9 and thought this was the greatest idea ever. And it was only 30 years away. Commercial production, even if they started working on the concept model today is probably still 30 years from now at the least.

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
5. Did I say that?
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 02:58 PM
Oct 2014

It just seems we hear these pronouncements about fusion every 6 months or so and nothing much comes of it. The ITER project is now expected to cost $50 Billion and isn't expected to begin fusion operations until 2027. This is only a demonstration operation. If successful, how long will it be before actual plants are constructed? ITER is the major international fusion project. It will be interesting to see who (if anybody) comes up with the money for UW to build their test plant to compete against ITER.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
3. I keep my fingers crossed for Fusion
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 11:22 AM
Oct 2014

A little bit cautious though because I remember when Nuclear made pretty much the same claims back in the '50s

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»UW fusion reactor concept...