Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Thu Oct 9, 2014, 09:53 AM Oct 2014

A cost-effective and energy-efficient approach to carbon capture

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-10/epfd-aca100714.php
[font face=Serif]PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:
9-Oct-2014

Contact: Nik Papageorgiou
n.papageorgiou@epfl.ch
41-216-932-105
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
@EPFL_en

[font size=5]A cost-effective and energy-efficient approach to carbon capture[/font]

[font size=3]Carbon capture is a process by which waste carbon dioxide (CO2) released by factories and power plants is collected and stored away, in order to reduce global carbon emissions. There are two major ways of carbon capture today, one using powder-like solid materials which "stick" to CO2, and one using liquids that absorb it. Despite their potential environmental and energy benefits, current carbon capture strategies are prohibitive because of engineering demands, cost and overall energy-efficiency. Collaborating scientists from EPFL, UC Berkley and Beijing have combined carbon-capturing solids and liquids to develop a "slurry" that offers the best of both worlds: as a liquid it is relatively simple to implement on a large scale, while it maintains the lower costs and energy efficiency of a solid carbon-capturing material. The breakthrough method is published in Nature Communications.



Working with scientists from Beijing and UC Berkeley, Smit is a lead author on a breakthrough carbon-capture innovation that uses a mixture of solid and liquid in solution called a "slurry". The solid part of the slurry is a MOF called ZIF-8, which is suspended in a 2-methylimidazole glycol liquid mixture.

"Why a slurry?" says Smit. "Because in the materials that are currently used for adsorption the pores are too large and the surrounding liquid would fill them, and not let them capture CO2 molecules. So here we looked at a material – ZIF-8 – whose pores are too small for the glycol's molecules to fit, but big enough for capturing the CO2 molecules from flue gas."



Because it combines the low cost and efficiency of nano-porous materials with the ease of a liquid-based separation process, the slurry successfully addresses these two main obstacles to the implementation of carbon capture in the real world. In addition, it shows exceptionally good separation from CO2, meaning that it doesn't require excessive amounts of energy (e.g. boiling) in order to regenerate, which increases its overall energy efficiency.

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6147
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A cost-effective and energy-efficient approach to carbon capture (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Oct 2014 OP
What's done with the CO2 after it's captured ? That's the killer. nt eppur_se_muova Oct 2014 #1
Believe it or not there is a commercial demand for CO2 OKIsItJustMe Oct 2014 #2

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
2. Believe it or not there is a commercial demand for CO2
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 10:24 AM
Oct 2014

People actually sell CO2 [igenerators]…

However, I think that supply might quickly exceed demand.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A cost-effective and ener...