Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 09:04 PM Oct 2014

Go, Pennsylvania! New Bill Calls For Removal Of 150' Stream Buffer For RE Development

Yet another battle of the economy versus the environment is taking place in Harrisburg. This time, conservationists say Pennsylvania’s cleanest streams are at stake. A bill (HB1565) working its way through the state legislature would eliminate a requirement for 150-foot buffer zones between new developments and specially protected watersheds.

Thick rows of trees and shrubs help keep pollution from washing off buildings and pavement into waterways. However, developers say waterfront property is valuable and 150 feet can be too much to ask for certain projects.

The buffer requirement – passed four years ago under the Rendell administration – only applies to developments that require stormwater discharge permits and that are adjacent to one of Pennsylvania’s “high quality” or “exceptional value” streams. These waterways are often used for recreation and are home to wild brook trout and other species.

“The regulation is very narrow,” said David Hess, a former secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. “It really only applies to a small percentage of the watersheds in Pennsylvania and even there, there are a lot of exemptions.” Developers can apply for waivers from the DEP.

EDIT

http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2014/10/13/bill-would-eliminate-buffer-requirement-for-pennsylvanias-cleanest-streams/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go, Pennsylvania! New Bill Calls For Removal Of 150' Stream Buffer For RE Development (Original Post) hatrack Oct 2014 OP
Should be a 1/2 mile buffer, or greater. nt NYC_SKP Oct 2014 #1
Who needs trout streams anyway? Botany Oct 2014 #2
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Go, Pennsylvania! New Bi...