Letter to the PM outlining how 2°C demands an 80% cut in EU emissions by 2030
From Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Centre
Letter to the PM outlining how 2°C demands an 80% cut in EU emissions by 2030
I wish to state my grave concern about the proposed 2030 framework for climate and energy policies that is to be finalised at this weeks European Council meeting of heads of state and senior ministers. If the 40% target proposed in the earlier Green Paper [1] is adopted, the EU will be signalling its dismissal of the IPCCs carbon budgets associated with a 2°C rise in global temperature. It will give priority to politically expediency at the expense of scientific integrity, irrevocably damaging the climate change negotiations in Paris 2015.
The IPCCs budgets, for a likely chance of not exceeding the 2°C target, range from around 600 to 1200 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2) for the period 2011-2100. To put this in context, in the four years since 2011 almost 150 billion tonnes have already been emitted; i.e. between a quarter and an eighth of the total carbon budget for the rest of the century. To estimate the budget for energy-only carbon, it is necessary to subtract emissions from deforestation and cement production. Even with stringent control on emissions from these sectors, the remaining carbon budget for energy equates to as few as 5 and at the most 20 years of emissions equivalent to those in 2014.
Put simply, the basic arithmetic of: (1) the IPCCs 2°C carbon budgets; (2) highly optimistic assumptions on deforestation and cement; (3) stringent emissions pathways for industrialising and poorer nations; and (4) the EUs oft-cited commitment on 2°C; requires the European Council to
increase the 2030 target to, at least, an 80% reduction in emissions.
Well, that ain't happening. So then what?