Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBP claims Deepwater Horizon fine could bankrupt subsidiary
BP PLC for the first time has identified in court papers the amount its subsidiary should pay in civil fines for its role in the Deepwater Horizon spill, claiming that anything more than $2.3 billion could result in insolvency.
The oil giant in court papers filed on Friday specified the dollar amount in arguing what BP Exploration & Production Inc. is liable for under the Clean Water Act for its negligence in causing the 2010 spill. The U.S. Department of Justice, in its own filings on Friday, continued to push for the maximum penalty of $13.7 billionor, at the very least, more than $12 billion.
BP Exploration & Production, which already spent $35.7 billion in claims payments and a massive cleanup of the Gulf of Mexico following the spill, said imposing too high a fine under the Clean Water Act would discourage other companies from doing the same.
Imposing a penalty on BPXP anywhere near the amount suggested by the United States would dis-incentivize future operators from engaging in a robust and sustained response like that mounted by BPXP, wrote BP spokesman Geoff Morrell in an emailed statement, referring to BP Production & Exploration. Furthermore, a [Clean Water Act] penalty above the low end of the statutory range would threaten BPXPs solvency and have a significant negative impact on BPXPs expenditures in the Gulf region.
The Justice Department also is seeking more than $1 billion against Anadarko Petroleum Corp., which co-owned the well where the rig exploded. Given the unprecedented seriousness of the violation, the defendants should justify why they should not pay the maximum penalty available, wrote Steven ORourke, senior attorney at the Justice Departments environmental enforcement section.
Natl Law Journal
http://link.nationallawjournal.com/54b6ae9e92721943738b547c2g26b.glk/VRtdtMPoL6NDeDrqAd523
Response to Panich52 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Poisoning a major body of water ought to be a business-ending event.
Galileo126
(2,016 posts)Corporations need people to survive.
People do not need corporations to survive.
Fuck'em.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Wonder if they retained some profit payments when they sold it.
Andarko sounds like a company GW created.
There was some shady story behind that also.
on point
(2,506 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)They know how to drill safely, they chose to "cut cost" rather than perform safely. This was not the decision made by the many companies who works out of the gulf or coast line.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)Arcadiasix
(255 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)My answer to any right winger who claims government regulation is to blame here is BP should have been more prudent in managing risk. Government didn't make them take the risks they did. They knew the rules and consequences for something bad happening and they did it anyway. Blaming government over reach is not the reason they'll be bankrupt.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The sooner the better.
JEB
(4,748 posts)virgdem
(2,124 posts)they deserve to go bust after the damage to animals and environment they caused in the Gulf. The Gulf will never be the same.