Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 11:53 AM Apr 2015

Floating nuclear power stations for the Arctic?

What could possibly go wrong?

Alaska Dispatch

An Ontario company is proposing the idea of small floating nuclear stations to power mining sites and towns in the Arctic.

At a mining symposium last week in the Arctic city of Iqaluit in Nunavut, Dunedin Energy Systems suggested the idea to meet growing energy needs in the North.

Currently Arctic towns, cities and various mine sites are powered by diesel generators. These produce substantial pollution and with fuel costs rising along with energy demand, alternatives are needed.

The company noted that the Russian firm OKBM is building a so-called FNPP -- floating nuclear power plant. The Akademik Lomonosov will have two modified naval propulsion reactors producing a peak total of 70 megawatts of electricity or 300 megawatts of heat.

For comparison, the diesel plant at Agnico Eagle Mining Ltd.’s Meadowbank gold mine in Nunavut has a generating capacity of 26 megawatts, and the City of Iqaluit’s power plant has a capacity of about 12 MW, Lang said.

The Russian ship is expected to be delivered to the Siberian port of Pevek, a town of 4,000, in 2016.

Some 15 countries around the world have expressed interest in leasing a Russian FNPP, according to a website called Nuclear Threat Initiative.

More
http://www.adn.com/article/20150422/floating-nuclear-power-stations-arctic
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Floating nuclear power stations for the Arctic? (Original Post) Panich52 Apr 2015 OP
Scientific American: Giant Waves Quickly Destroy Arctic Ocean Ice and Ecosystems Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #1
It's a trifecta! Nihil Apr 2015 #2

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
1. Scientific American: Giant Waves Quickly Destroy Arctic Ocean Ice and Ecosystems
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 12:03 PM
Apr 2015

A post from yesterday says it all. What could wrong indeed?

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. It's a trifecta!
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 04:14 AM
Apr 2015

Floating nuclear power stations in the Arctic
+
Giant waves that render the environment even more dangerous getting more frequent due to climate change
+
The reason for wanting the FNPS in the first place: "to power mining sites and towns in the Arctic"

Go tool-monkeys go!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Floating nuclear power st...