Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe Climate Change Fight Cannot Be Won with White Liberal America Alone
The Climate Change Fight Cannot Be Won with White Liberal America Alone
Environmental advocacy must start representing the country we live in a country where Asian and Latino families are the fastest growing populations
5/26/2015
A recent report released by Green 2.0 highlights the environmental movements disconcerting lack of diversity. Unconscious bias, inadequate recruitment and poor retention all stand in the way of a more diverse environmental movement. People of color make up 36% of the US population and comprise 29% of the science and engineering workforce, but the report found that only about 12% of staff at the mainstream environmental advocacy groups and foundations that fund them are people of color. A separate report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy found that while environmental funders spent $10bn between 2000 and 2009, just 15% of those dollars benefited poor and under-served communities.
The problem is just as serious at the top levels of environmental organizations. While 22.5% of interns at environmental organizations are people of color, only 12% of leadership positions and 4.6% of board positions are held by people of color. With some notable exceptions such as Aaron Mairs recent appointment as The Sierra Clubs first African-American national president you see less diversity the further up the organizational chart you go. This failure comes despite the disproportionate impact of environmental hazards on communities of color and the fact that people of color support executive action on climate change more strongly than white Americans.
If environmental advocacy doesnt start representing the country we live in a country where Asian and Latino families are the fastest growing populations and where California is already majority non-white everything weve worked for is at risk. Even if general public awareness of environmental issues is higher today than it was 50 or 100 years ago, the momentum were seeing today could evaporate if we dont include new partners in the coalition.
Well never get climate legislation if Congress thinks only environmentalists in most minds, a relatively small slice of white liberal America truly care about the issue.
... Without a more diverse environmental movement, Id question whether well see any major policy advances in the coming decade at all.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/26/climate-change-fight-cannot-be-won-white-liberal-america-alone
Environmental advocacy must start representing the country we live in a country where Asian and Latino families are the fastest growing populations
5/26/2015
A recent report released by Green 2.0 highlights the environmental movements disconcerting lack of diversity. Unconscious bias, inadequate recruitment and poor retention all stand in the way of a more diverse environmental movement. People of color make up 36% of the US population and comprise 29% of the science and engineering workforce, but the report found that only about 12% of staff at the mainstream environmental advocacy groups and foundations that fund them are people of color. A separate report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy found that while environmental funders spent $10bn between 2000 and 2009, just 15% of those dollars benefited poor and under-served communities.
The problem is just as serious at the top levels of environmental organizations. While 22.5% of interns at environmental organizations are people of color, only 12% of leadership positions and 4.6% of board positions are held by people of color. With some notable exceptions such as Aaron Mairs recent appointment as The Sierra Clubs first African-American national president you see less diversity the further up the organizational chart you go. This failure comes despite the disproportionate impact of environmental hazards on communities of color and the fact that people of color support executive action on climate change more strongly than white Americans.
If environmental advocacy doesnt start representing the country we live in a country where Asian and Latino families are the fastest growing populations and where California is already majority non-white everything weve worked for is at risk. Even if general public awareness of environmental issues is higher today than it was 50 or 100 years ago, the momentum were seeing today could evaporate if we dont include new partners in the coalition.
Well never get climate legislation if Congress thinks only environmentalists in most minds, a relatively small slice of white liberal America truly care about the issue.
... Without a more diverse environmental movement, Id question whether well see any major policy advances in the coming decade at all.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/26/climate-change-fight-cannot-be-won-white-liberal-america-alone
We are compartmentalized into this "far left" group of liberal "environmentalists", called "elitists". All manufactured BS. And this article points out a glaringly obvious reason why the efforts to paint us as a fringe group are so successful. We really need to get more people of all backgrounds & color involved in order to be heard & seen as a national voice to be represented rather than the relatively small, easily dismissed white liberal group we are currently.
I think its a very important point! We can spend all of our time pointing at the science and hoping the population will get their heads out of the sand, or we can get more of the population involved in trying to save sustainable life on earth.
What do you guys think?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 913 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Climate Change Fight Cannot Be Won with White Liberal America Alone (Original Post)
RiverLover
May 2015
OP
It seems obvious that white liberals shouldn't get involved in environmental causes
Fumesucker
May 2015
#1
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)1. It seems obvious that white liberals shouldn't get involved in environmental causes
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)2. The title is misleading...
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 09:24 AM - Edit history (1)
The Climate Change Fight Cannot Be WonI fixed it for you.
The problem is that climate change is not an American issue, let alone a left-right issue. It is a global crisis, and even to begin addressing it would require three things:
1. All nations to agree that the human presence on the planet is, in aggregate, too large and too active;
2. All nations to agree that reducing the human presence on the planet in either numbers, economic activity levels - or both - is essential if we are to have any hope of mitigating the multi-dimensional predicament we have unleashed upon the biosphere; and
3. All nations to agree to relinquish the potential national advantages that would accrue from becoming a free rider.
Without such international agreements, all that can be done is to delay the inevitable.
How likely does anyone think such agreements are?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)3. So why are we bothering with renewable energy sources at all?
Why are we trying to fight drilling & pipelines & dependence on fossil fuels if its all for nothing due to overpopulation?
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)5. Because it's what humans do. nt
Duppers
(28,094 posts)7. Because it can be somewhat delayed.
I'll take any delay for my son's sake.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)4. kick, kick, kick....
bananas
(27,509 posts)6. Obama threw Van Jones under the bus.
It was gruesome.