Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some of us believe that the sooner civilization crashes the better it will be for the planet... (Original Post) GliderGuider Sep 2015 OP
That belief is naive OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #1
Not to mention cannibalism... 2naSalit Sep 2015 #2
If the biosphere is destroyed, in what sense did it benefit from our departure? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #3
We probably won't 2naSalit Sep 2015 #4
What happens to all the petro chemical plants when they lose power? Finishline42 Sep 2015 #8
These things will have mostly localized effects, and be relatively short-lived OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #9
The earth is a large ball of molten iron with surface impurities Agnosticsherbet Sep 2015 #5
An oldie but a goodie Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #6
Except, it’s not just us OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #10
True. And each time, what WAS nature gets replaced by a new and different nature. Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #12
Or, it might not OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #14
Good point. Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #15
I (for one) would consider it a great loss regardless of whether I was here to know or not OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #16
A colleague of mine told our university president he voted for Romney for exactly that reason caraher Sep 2015 #7
Speaking of twisted belief systems... kristopher Sep 2015 #11
Huh. That policy seems completely rational to me. GliderGuider Sep 2015 #13

2naSalit

(86,536 posts)
2. Not to mention cannibalism...
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 09:34 PM
Sep 2015

But I also agree that the biosphere will make a regenerative type recovery after we are gone, just not like what is here now.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
3. If the biosphere is destroyed, in what sense did it benefit from our departure?
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 09:54 PM
Sep 2015

People have this romantic view that humanity will disappear, leaving a hole that “nature” will fill.

It’s not going to happen. Not now.

We have gotten to a point that we seriously contemplate setting up colonies on the Moon and Mars. You may safely assume that if things get bad enough, we will do likewise on Earth. If we need to build domes, we will.

2naSalit

(86,536 posts)
4. We probably won't
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 10:08 PM
Sep 2015

completely destroy all life forms in the biosphere so I'm suspecting that there will be something that survives at some level. I didn't say that there was a benefit to our destruction but some life forms will survive and from that baseline, some kind of biospheric revival is likely... though it will probably be very different from what it is while we are here. But we won't be around to know what that is or looks like. the planet will survive us, and it will be much different after we have destroyed ourselves and a lot of life forms that we now recognize.

Finishline42

(1,091 posts)
8. What happens to all the petro chemical plants when they lose power?
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 08:27 PM
Sep 2015

What happens to all the petrochemical plants when they lose power?

What happens to all the nuclear plants?

What happens to all the hazardous chemicals stored in manufacturing plants and warehouses?

These facilities operate everyday and keep these poisons under control but when it all goes up in smoke these places will be vast uninhabitable areas - like Bhopal and Chernobyl.

When government fall apart and nobody has the money to do simple things like take the trash to the land fill or keep the sewage plants working.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
9. These things will have mostly localized effects, and be relatively short-lived
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 12:55 PM
Sep 2015

I don’t mean to downplay them, however, the effects of Climate Change would be global, and would last 100's of 1000's of years.

If we affect the climate enough to kill ourselves off (in spite of our technology) what other species will survive?

Let’s say (for example) we affect weather patterns enough to cause general crop failure. (Other species eat plants, or eat other species which eat plants.)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
5. The earth is a large ball of molten iron with surface impurities
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 10:23 PM
Sep 2015

And an infection of various life forms upon its surface.

There us nothing bout the planet that will notice.

In about two billon years, the sun will expand to a red giant, and the earth will be evaporated.

Why do people think the earth will be better?

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
12. True. And each time, what WAS nature gets replaced by a new and different nature.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:17 PM
Sep 2015

It may take a few million years, but eventually, life finds a way, and ecological health and diversity return, only to be replaced again by another new nature.

That new nature may not have polar bears and white rhinos, but OUR nature doesn't have trilobites and megatheriums. Nothing is permanent, and mourning change is like mourning sunset. It's perfectly natural and mourning doesn't prevent it from coming.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
14. Or, it might not
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 03:07 PM
Sep 2015

It appears that Mars may have had life at one time.

If so, life apparently did not “find a way.”

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
15. Good point.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 03:08 PM
Sep 2015

Either way, humans probably won't be here to notice which way it goes.

Maybe, just maybe... In a galaxy far, far away... intelligent life might take another stab at surviving. Of course we won't how that experiment turns out either.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
16. I (for one) would consider it a great loss regardless of whether I was here to know or not
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 03:28 PM
Sep 2015

Too many people have this notion of “Gaia” as a wise & benevolent godess who will work to preserve life.

“Gaia” is a hypothetical construct. We don’t know how common or uncommon life is. Based on our limited observations, it could extremely common or extremely rare.

We have an extremely limited dataset, but, whether it meets our expectations or not, to our knowledge ours is the only inhabited planet in the cosmos.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
7. A colleague of mine told our university president he voted for Romney for exactly that reason
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 02:22 AM
Sep 2015

I'm not sure whether he was joking... though if he did vote for Romney it could only have been for that reason!

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
11. Speaking of twisted belief systems...
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:18 PM
Sep 2015
http://listverse.com/2011/08/15/top-10-bizarre-belief-systems/

Other than perhaps degree of commitment, I can't see any essential difference between your posts and number 2 on their list:

Church Of Euthanasia



The argument over the reality of Climate Change and Global Warming may rage around the world, but it is hard to find opposition to the concerns raised around over-population. So great is the problem that China, a country whose standing as a superpower is built on the size of its population, has conceded to implementing the infamous One Child Policy. This policy limits couples to one child and imposes fines and even forced sterilization in the events of subsequent successful pregnancies.

The Church of Euthanasia takes a “What’s done is done?” attitude to children already present, but steps up the bizarre scale by promoting the use of suicide, abortion, cannibalism and, of course, sodomy as means of addressing the population issue. Proclaiming itself as “a non-profit educational foundation devoted to restoring balance between Humans and the remaining species on Earth”, the Church of Euthanasia is a vocal opponent to everyone from anti-abortion groups to those Jonathon King described as giving “the rotting the dead the will to live, go on and never die.

”Started by the Rev, Chris Korda in Massachusetts, USA, the Church of Euthanasia has only one commandment, “Thou Shalt Not Procreate”. However, it does stress that all of its principle pillars, suicide, abortion, cannibalism and sodomy, are only supported as voluntary means of achieving the Church’s goals. This means that the Church does not sanction murder, rape and involuntary sterilization and cannibalism is limited to only eating people who are already dead.“Save The Planet, Kill Yourself” is a standard slogan and bumper sticker, but this and other similarly catchphrases paled into deathly insignificance against the Rev. Korda’s music video release, “I Like To Watch”. Using a blend of hard-core pornography and footage of the collapsing World Trade Center, Rev. Korda struck a discord with almost every level of society and provided invaluable publicity for the Church of Euthanasia.

Prior to this, the Church had only really come to prominence...
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
13. Huh. That policy seems completely rational to me.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:40 PM
Sep 2015

Go figure!

However, it does stress that all of its principle pillars, suicide, abortion, cannibalism and sodomy, are only supported as voluntary means of achieving the Church’s goals. This means that the Church does not sanction murder, rape and involuntary sterilization and cannibalism is limited to only eating people who are already dead.

I don't see anything whatsoever wrong with this position. I certainly would never kill anyone, or eat someone who wasn't dead yet! Even the amoral have rules, after all.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Some of us believe that t...