Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumU.S. justices question Obama administration electricity markets rule
Source: Reuters
US | Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:51pm EDT
U.S. justices question Obama administration electricity markets rule
WASHINGTON | BY LAWRENCE HURLEY
Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday expressed doubt about whether the Obama administration had the authority to issue a regulation aimed at encouraging efficiency in the electricity market by having electrical grid operators pay users to reduce consumption at peak times.
The court heard oral arguments in an appeal filed by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission seeking to reverse a May 2014 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that threw out the rule.
The case pits the government's energy regulator against power companies that are fighting a regulation that promises to cut into their profits.
The regulation concerns what FERC calls "demand response," which is when, in an attempt to manage demand for electricity, regional electrical grid operators agree to pay electricity users to cut consumption at peak times. It is aimed at improving grid reliability, lowering costs and encouraging clean energy.
The rule remains in effect while the case continues.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/14/us-usa-court-electricity-idUSKCN0S823H20151014
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Just like Obamacare...the legacy of the Obama administration is Rube Goldbergian policy.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)It is an extremely streamlined, efficient and effective way to do "it".
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)because Republicans have no interest in reducing the costs of energy at the expense of corporations, using regulatory bodies remains the only way.
Finishline42
(1,091 posts)The utilities want this fight at the state level where they dominate those commissions. The utility commissions in many states are dominated by utilities and their lobbyist. They are supposed to be protecting the customers but it's clear by their actions it's the utility interest they serve.