Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 05:21 PM Oct 2015

Carbon sequestration in soil: The potential underfoot

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/news/151019-soil-carbon.html
[font face=Serif]19 October 2015

[font size=5]Carbon sequestration in soil: The potential underfoot[/font]

[font size=4]Declining greenhouse gas emissions from European cropland could compensate for up to 7% of annual agricultural emissions from the region, according to a new study analyzing the carbon uptake potential of soil. However at global scale, indirect effects could offset significant parts of these emission savings.[/font]

[font size=3]A new study published in the journal Global Environmental Change projects that carbon sequestration in European cropland could store between 9 and 38 megatons of CO2 (MtCO2) per year in the soil, or as much as 7% of the annual greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in the European Union, at a price of carbon of 100 $/tCO2.

“However, if strict emission reduction targets are only adopted inside Europe, efforts within the EU to reduce emissions could lead to increased emissions in other parts of the world, which could significantly compromise emission reductions at global level” says IIASA researcher Stefan Frank, who led the study.

In order to reach the EU goals on climate change, mitigation measures will be needed across many sectors. This research focuses on the agriculture piece of that puzzle. The world’s soils contain the third largest stock of carbon, after oceans and the geological pool, which includes rocks and fossil fuels. Any disturbance of soils, for example through inappropriate management or land use change could therefore release significant amounts of carbon to the atmosphere. Good management practices, on the other hand, can significantly reduce emissions.

…[/font][/font]
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carbon sequestration in soil: The potential underfoot (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Oct 2015 OP
Yes! appal_jack Oct 2015 #1
Terra Preta (AKA “Biochar”) OKIsItJustMe Oct 2015 #2
might be a good place for this Kali Oct 2015 #3
 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
1. Yes!
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 05:37 PM
Oct 2015

Cover crops, composting, organic management, managed intensive grazing, perennial polycultures, food forests, etc.

Nurture earthworms, dung beetles, and micro-arthropods, and they will go to work turning volatile, global-warming carbon into fixed and stable humic compounds in due time. They get the food and habitat they need, we get deep, dark, rich soils, and the planet's excess carbon goes somewhere useful: win-win-win!

Avoid poisons as much as possible: is that herbicide, insecticide, or fungicide really necessary, or might there be a cultural or physical practice that can take its place?

Nice to see this discussed here. One of the most pressing issues and important opportunities of our time. K&R,

-app

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
2. Terra Preta (AKA “Biochar”)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 05:43 PM
Oct 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Terra preta[/font][HR][font size=1]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/font]

[font size=3]Terra preta (Portuguese pronunciation: [ˈtɛʁɐ ˈpɾetɐ], locally [ˈtɛhɐ ˈpɾetɐ], literally "black earth" or "black land" in Portuguese) is a type of very dark, fertile manmade (anthropogenic) soil found in the Amazon Basin. Terra preta owes its name to its very high charcoal content, and was made by adding a mixture of charcoal, bone, and manure to the otherwise relatively infertile Amazonian soil. It is very stable and remains in the soil for thousands of years.[1][2] It is also known as "Amazonian dark earth" or "Indian black earth". In Portuguese its full name is terra preta do índio or terra preta de índio ("black earth of the Indian", "Indians' black earth&quot . Terra mulata ("mulatto earth&quot is lighter or brownish in colour.[3]

Terra preta is characterized by the presence of low-temperature charcoal in high concentrations; of high quantities of pottery sherds; of organic matter such as plant residues, animal feces, fish and animal bones and other material; and of nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn).[4] It also shows high levels of microorganic activities and other specific characteristics within its particular ecosystem. It is less prone to nutrient leaching, which is a major problem in most rain forests. Terra preta zones are generally surrounded by terra comum ([ˈtɛhɐ koˈmũ] or [ˈtɛhɐ kuˈmũ]), or "common soil"; these are infertile soils, mainly acrisols,[4] but also ferralsols and arenosols.[5]

Terra preta soils are of pre-Columbian nature and were created by humans between 450 BC and AD 950.[6][7] The soil's depth can reach 2 meters (6.6 ft). Thousands of years after its creation it has been reported to regenerate itself at the rate of 1 centimeter (0.39 in) per year[8] by the local farmers and caboclos in Brazil's Amazonian basin, who seek it for use and for sale as valuable potting soil.

…[/font][/font]
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Carbon sequestration in s...