Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:20 AM Mar 2016

Geoengineering is no place for corporate profit making (Guardian)

“Save the world and make a little cash on the side.” That’s the motto of Russ George, the colourful entrepreneur behind Planktos Science who wants to put geoengineering into practice now. George is convinced that by adding iron sulphate to the oceans, he can stimulate plankton blooms and so suck enough carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere to offset human emissions from burning coal and oil.

In 2007, backed by a Canadian real estate developer, the Planktos ship set sail from San Francisco bound for the Galapagos Islands and loaded up with iron sulphate. George was going to make a killing by selling carbon offsets to whoever wanted them.

George believed, and told whoever asked, that ocean fertilization could become a $100bn business and hinted to journalist Jeff Goodell that America’s biggest coal-burning utility was interested in buying his carbon credits.

The venture soon collapsed, leaving a cloud of mistrust hanging over all research into iron fertilisation. Not long after Russ George set the regulatory alarm bells ringing, the London Convention, which regulates ocean dumping, and the Convention on Biological Diversity both passed resolutions banning iron fertilisation experiments except under restrictive conditions.

Rogue geoengineers like Russ George drive respectable researchers crazy, not to mention those business people who think there really are profits to be had from a plan B. On this question, last week’s report by the US National Research Council (NRC) stresses that carbon dioxide removal is expensive and limited by “technical immaturity”.

cont'd
http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/feb/17/geoengineering-is-no-place-for-corporate-profit-making

List Of Companies/Gov. Programs Engaged in Weather Modification in U.S.

This link provides a list of Weather Modification companies currently operating in the US and much more. It also contains a list of US Government agencies currently engaging in weather Modification. In addition, it contains a list of US Patents that apply directly to weather modification and those in active use today. Plus, much more.

Here’s a snippet of the information contained on the dutchsinse.com website:

Weather modification COMPANIES in operation today inside the USA:

http://www.wtwma.com

http://www.weathermodification.com

http://www.naiwmc.org/

http://www.just-clouds.com/

HAARP patent:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26517997/Us-Patent-Harrp-5041834#fullscreen n

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4686605.pdf

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4712155.pdf

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5038664.pdf

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/list-of-companies-engaged-in-weather-modification/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Geoengineering is no plac...