Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumThe Bagman Speaks to Greece
http://www.ekathimerini.com/201870/article/ekathimerini/business/imf-approves-126m-euro-disbursement-for-bailed-out-cyprusIMF approves 126m euro disbursement for bailed-out Cyprus
BUSINESS 12:12
The International Monetary Fund has approved the disbursement of another 126 million euros ($140.5 million) for bailed-out Cyprus, saying that the island nation's reform program continues to be "a success."
The IMF said Wednesday total disbursements so far amount to around 882 million euros ($983.4 million) from a contribution of around 1 billion euros. Another 9 billion euros is being provided by the European Union's bailout fund.
IMF Deputy Managing Director Mitsuhiro Furusawa said Cyprus' economy fared better than expected in the first half of the year.
But he urged more efforts to deal with a huge number of bad loans, cautious spending in light of a high public debt and to expedite privatizations.
--
Privatizations are what IMF 'investors' are looking for.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 514 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Bagman Speaks to Greece (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Sep 2015
OP
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Privatizations are what IMF 'investors' are looking for. Exactly.
And they are coming for American privatization big time.
The TPP and other corporate coups will emphasize privatizing our water and the post office and anything else they can get their claws into.
The TPP, TTIP and TISA agreements could transform public services by allowing multinational corporations into these services and limiting how governments can regulate the services they provide.
http://stopthetpp.org/fast-track-for-trade-deals-would-expand-privatization-of-public-services/
Its not surprising that these trade negotiations have been held in secret. What we do know is devastating:
All Public Services Would Be Subject to Trade Rules. Generally, current trade agreements exclude nearly all public services. Under these trade deals, transportation, water treatment, education, health care, corrections and other public services would be affected.
Regulated Protections and Standards Will Be Undermined. The agreements would restrict the ability of governments to establish new regulations, such as worker safety, consumer protections, or licensing requirements. Negotiators claim these kinds of public safety regulations limit competition and are a barrier to entry by foreign for-profit corporations.
Privatization will be Expanded and Locked In. TISA would bar governments from converting existing private services to publicly based, and would prevent governments from shifting privatized workers back to the public sector, even if its shown that the privatization effort was a failure.
Off-Shoring the Public Sector. The trade in cross border servicessection of trade agreements forbids governments from requiring that a foreign firm set up a domestic operation to provide services. This would allow corporations in other countries to supply services to the U.S. without actually employing any U.S. workers.
All Public Services Would Be Subject to Trade Rules. Generally, current trade agreements exclude nearly all public services. Under these trade deals, transportation, water treatment, education, health care, corrections and other public services would be affected.
Regulated Protections and Standards Will Be Undermined. The agreements would restrict the ability of governments to establish new regulations, such as worker safety, consumer protections, or licensing requirements. Negotiators claim these kinds of public safety regulations limit competition and are a barrier to entry by foreign for-profit corporations.
Privatization will be Expanded and Locked In. TISA would bar governments from converting existing private services to publicly based, and would prevent governments from shifting privatized workers back to the public sector, even if its shown that the privatization effort was a failure.
Off-Shoring the Public Sector. The trade in cross border servicessection of trade agreements forbids governments from requiring that a foreign firm set up a domestic operation to provide services. This would allow corporations in other countries to supply services to the U.S. without actually employing any U.S. workers.
HOW TRADE AGREEMENTS COULD EXPAND PRIVATIZATION TO BENEFIT MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS
Municipal water systems would be vulnerable to companies like Veolia, a French-owned multinational and the largest water and wastewater privatization firm in the world. Veolia has a tainted history of doing business in the United States.
Burlingame and Richmond, Calif., sued Veolia for dumping tens of millions of gallons of untreated wastewater and sewage into San Francisco Bay, and Indianapolis sued Veolia for overcharging 250,000 residents.
If those local governments wanted to return their water systems to municipal control, Veolia likely could use the provisions of the trade agreements to challenge that effort.
Municipal water systems would be vulnerable to companies like Veolia, a French-owned multinational and the largest water and wastewater privatization firm in the world. Veolia has a tainted history of doing business in the United States.
Burlingame and Richmond, Calif., sued Veolia for dumping tens of millions of gallons of untreated wastewater and sewage into San Francisco Bay, and Indianapolis sued Veolia for overcharging 250,000 residents.
If those local governments wanted to return their water systems to municipal control, Veolia likely could use the provisions of the trade agreements to challenge that effort.
I know this may be swiftly attacked because the trade agreements are supposed to be "secret", but enough has been leaked so we know just why the agreements are secret. They are bad news for people, great news for corporations. I will never forget who shilled for or voted for these agreements, and will vote (or not vote) accordingly.
polly7
(20,582 posts)2. A financial coup ....
and it's spreading - to Ukraine and every other country unable to economically fight it off.
Makes me sick to see.