Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumFor 4th day, shaky cease-fire calms Syrian skies
HEMEIMEEM AIR BASE, Syria -- Dozens of Russian warplanes sat idle Tuesday on the tarmac at this Russian air base in Syria on the fourth day of a cease-fire brokered by Moscow and Washington.
The apparent lull in action witnessed by the AP on a trip to the base, which was organized by the Russian defense and foreign ministries, contrasts with the hectic operation AP reporters saw here on a previous visit in January.
The cease-fire that began at midnight Friday has brought a notable reduction in hostilities for the first time in the five-year war that has killed more than 250,000 people, displaced half of Syria's population and flooded Europe with refugees.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/syria-cease-fire-russia-airstrikes-opposition-truce-violation-hemeimeem/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)President Bashar al-Assad appeared in an interview with German television on Tuesday and spoke in support of the current truce which began Saturday in Syria.
"We will do our part so that the whole thing works," he told German public broadcaster ARD in an interview.
"We have refrained ourselves from retaliating in order to give (a) chance for the agreement to survive," he added. "That's what we can do, but at the end everything has a limit. It depends on the other side."
http://www.dw.com/en/syrian-president-bashar-al-assad-describes-truce-as-glimmer-of-hope/a-19084604
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Russia's Defence Ministry continues to abstain from striking those areas in Syria where "the moderate opposition" respects the ceasefire agreement, Interfax news agency reported on Tuesday.
A total of 15 cases of ceasefire violations have been registered in Syria in the past 24 hours, Interfax quoted the Russian military as saying.
http://www.reuters.com/article/mideast-crisis-russia-syria-idUSR4N165008?rpc=401
bemildred
(90,061 posts)BERLIN, March 1. /TASS/. Syrian President Bashar Assad has offered amnesty and an opportunity to return to peaceful life to militants of the opposition groups. He made this statement in an interview with the German broadcasting corporation ARD.
Assad called the ceasefire established on February 27 "a glimmer of hope."
http://tass.ru/en/world/859881
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The Russian bombardment of Aleppo has prompted calls for the United States to dramatically alter its approach to the Syrian conflict. Washington is currently losing its clandestine war against Syrian President Bashar al Assad. Russian intervention has altered the dynamics on the battlefield, largely because its air force has shown no remorse over the mass killing of innocent civilians. Moscow is committed to a Vietnam-style aerial campaign in support of Assad, despite possessing the capability to strike targets with precision. The Russian Air Force has defied expectations and continues to maintain a high sortie rate as a result of its very lax rules of engagement and the use of Russia-based strategic aircraft to augment its assets in theater.
To address recent Russian advances in north Aleppo, the United States is pushing for a ceasefire, with quiet support from Turkey and Arab countries. Recently, the United States finalized an agreement with Russia on the terms for a cessation of hostilities, a pause designed to allow the provision of humanitarian aid to besieged areas and aid with the ongoing political efforts to negotiate an end to the Syrian civil conflict. The agreement allows for the continued targeting of anti-Assad groups the United Nations has listed as terrorists. This carve-out will allow for continued American strikes on the Islamic State and continued Russian efforts to target Jabhat al Nusra, Syrias al Qaeda affiliate. The problem is that Russia has used Nusras presence in anti-Assad areas to justify their heavy-handed aerial campaign. Areas of rebel control are not always clearly delineated from each other, a fact that gives Russia an easy excuse to target a wider range of actors. Russias campaign has proved effective in helping to change the dynamics of the battlefield in favor of the Assad regime, largely at the expense of the anti-Assad opposition.
It remains to be seen how this agreement plays out, but already, analysts and policymakers are asking: What happens if the agreement fails? And what leverage, if any, does the United States have to force a political transition once the agreement presumably breaks down?
http://warontherocks.com/2016/03/the-promise-and-peril-of-changing-u-s-strategy-in-syria/?singlepage=1