Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup

[jakeXT]

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

...

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/

And why were they allowed to see the report?

[djean111]

1. And why were they allowed to see the report?

That puzzles me, too. Who/what benefits?

[TBA]

2. Question for someone who understands foreign affairs better than I do ...

Assuming 9/11 was sponsored by the Saudis, what may have been their motive? What did they stand to gain?

[elias7]

4. Another question...

Assuming 9/11 was sponsored by the Saudis, what conditions existed so that their clearly provable involvement would not result in a declaration of war by the US.

Unless, the US and Saudis were partners....

[Scuba]

3. Hard to justify invading Iraq if everyone knows someone else did it.