Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumShimon Peres doubts Israel can win Permanent war or Survive Annexation of West Bank
By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) |
Former Israeli president Shimon Peres, 92, gave an interview with the Associated Press Monday in which he spoke bluntly about the mistakes of prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, without naming him.
Of the Greater Israel project of the countrys right wing, which aims at annexing the Palestinian West Bank while keeping the people there stateless, he said,
Better to have a Jewish state on part of the land than have the whole land without the Jewish state, he said. Israel should implement the two-state solution for her own sake because if we should lose our majority, and today we are almost equal, we cannot remain a Jewish state or a democratic state . . . Thats the main issue, and to my regret they (the government) do the opposite.
That is, Peres thinks that the Likud Party and its partners are living in a fools paradise if they believe they can annex the whole of Palestinian territory without getting the Palestinians as Israeli citizens eventually. And then, Peres says, no more Israel as a Jewish state.
Netanyahu is willing to live by the sword more or less permanently in order to accomplish his annexation of the Palestinian West Bank. Peres thinks this approach foolish and dangerous. ...............(more)
http://www.juancole.com/2015/11/permanent-survive-annexation.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)grandchildren. Their thinking is "we are stronger so why would we give up land, resources, and control and get nothing in return? The powerful extract concessions from the weak, not vice versa."
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)What is the timeline from today's Israel and today's Palestinians to a situation where Israel and the Palestinians are at peace with each other?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and the binational state that replaces them can get on with the business of bringing everyone together.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Step 1: The Palestinians strike back at the Israelis.
Step 2: The Israelis strike back at the Palestinians.
Step 3: See Step 1.
Come on:
Gimme a wild speculation how your scenario could come true. (Imagine writing a sci-fi-novel and a character talks about a long-gone past.)
Is there sci-fi that deals with the future of Israel?
The only example I know is the double novel "Ilium"/"Olympos" by Dan Simmons:
In a flashback to the distant past, Jerusalem is split between Jews and Muslims and the Muslims are blasting anti-semitic chants from loudspeakers in their quarters. But it is never explained how this came to be.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)- domestic terror-attacks
- civil unrest
- international isolation
The dissolution of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s meant the African National Congress (ANC) in alliance with the South African Communist Party could no longer depend on the Soviet Union for weaponry and political support. It also meant the apartheid government could no longer link apartheid and its purported legitimacy to the protection of Christian values and civilisation in the face of the rooi gevaar, meaning "red danger" or the threat of communism.
What Israel and the Palestinians need are reconciliation and bonding. Ramping up the pressure until one side breaks is the wrong way to go in this case. There must be a WILL to peace.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)can start getting better.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Laying siege to them won't deter them the least bit. The pressure needed to force Israel to change its political position is awfully close to the pressure it takes to break Israel as a functioning society.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Israel...let alone Israeli history books in the future.