Israel gets to use violence. Palestinians don’t. That’s the rule
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/11/israel-violence-palestinians
Obamas position on the Israel Palestine conflict was flawed from the beginning and people cut him way too much slack on this. Hes always talked about settlements being a problem and he talked about Palestinian aspirations two days ago, but he has never condemned Israeli violence against Palestinians the way he condemns Palestinian terror. This is the safe, acceptable mainstream way of saying you favor a two state solution without crossing a line. The line is thisIsrael gets to use violence and Palestinians dont, thats the unspoken rule, and that explains why Obama says Israel has a right, even an obligation to defend itself when he would never use such words about Palestinians.
He is saying that Israel has human rights that must be respected right now without qualification, while Palestinians have aspirations that need to be negotiated. This is also how the New York Times editors think.
Im starting to think this is the fundamental issuewho gets to use violence, or alternatively, whose violence gets condemned? I hate to put it that way because I dont want the Palestinians to use violence either, but as a matter of principle thats what the issue is. There is always going to be violence until a true solution is reachedPalestinians live with it on various levels, up to and including the occasional killing by an IDF soldier or settler during periods of calm, and this causes no outrage with the Obama/New York Times type of liberal, but when Palestinians use violence, whether against civilians or police or soldiers, it is terrorism and Israel has the right to do whatever it chooses to stop it. When you take that attitude then the settlement issue is more of a long-term abstract sort of thing, something to be negotiated. Aspirational. Even when Obama wanted a freeze it didnt mean much, because he wasnt going to do anything about it. For him, the freeze was also aspirational. Because, gosh, without a cessation in settlements someday in the future Israel might cease to be a Jewish democracy. But its a future problem and it is concern on behalf of Israel more than on behalf of Palestinians, though to be fair Obama does mention the hopes of Palestinians sometimes. That Palestinian rights are violated right nowwell, he doesnt see any urgency.
Only when Israelis get hurt should something forceful (literally) be undertaken and then it doesnt matter how many Palestinians get hurt in the process.