Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 10:12 PM Jan 2013

Secret Donors Finance Fight Against Hagel

<snip>

"A brand new conservative group calling itself Americans for a Strong Defense and financed by anonymous donors is running advertisements urging Democratic senators in five states to vote against Chuck Hagel, President Obama’s nominee to be secretary of defense, saying he would make the United States “a weaker country.”

Another freshly minted and anonymously backed organization, Use Your Mandate, which presents itself as a liberal gay rights group but purchases its television time through a prominent Republican firm, is attacking Mr. Hagel as “anti-Gay,” “anti-woman” and “anti-Israel” in ads and mailers.

Those groups are joining at least five others that are organizing to stop Mr. Hagel’s confirmation, a goal even they acknowledge appears to be increasingly challenging. But the effort comes with a built-in consolation prize should it fail: depleting some of Mr. Obama’s political capital as he embarks on a new term with fresh momentum.

The media campaign to scuttle Mr. Hagel’s appointment, unmatched in the annals of modern presidential cabinet appointments, reflects the continuing effects of the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which loosened campaign finance restrictions and was a major reason for the record spending by outside groups in the 2012 election. All told, these independent and largely secretly financed groups spent well over $500 million in an attempt to defeat Mr. Obama and the Democrats, a failure that seemed all the greater given the huge amounts spent."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/us/politics/secret-donors-finance-fight-against-hagel.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Secret Donors Finance Fight Against Hagel (Original Post) Scurrilous Jan 2013 OP
Always good to watch Republicans throwing money away oberliner Jan 2013 #1
I don't think AIPAC's strong influence on US politics is "myth". delrem Jan 2013 #3
AIPAC has not taken any position on Hagel oberliner Feb 2013 #8
I was responding to *your* use of the term 'myth'. n/t delrem Feb 2013 #11
But Hagel is now on message..Chuck Schumer says so: Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #2
well, there you go... delrem Jan 2013 #4
Some like to pretend the lobby is a myth, the policies we have appear more acceptable that way. Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #5
GOP Sen. Cochran will back Hagel Scurrilous Jan 2013 #6
MJ Rosenberg's tweet: Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #7
MJ on the case! oberliner Feb 2013 #9
I knew you'd enjoy it. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2013 #10
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
1. Always good to watch Republicans throwing money away
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jan 2013

Weird that Obama nominated Hagel when people were saying "The Lobby" would never allow such a thing to take place.

Perhaps some myths are being shattered finally.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
3. I don't think AIPAC's strong influence on US politics is "myth".
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:17 AM
Jan 2013

Sometimes you've got to call it how it is, oberliner.
On the other hand individuals like Adelson, not so much. Didn't he waste a ton of $$ on Gingrich?

Isn't it more correct to say that "The Lobby" would try to bar a (perceived) anti-Israel appointment to go through, and "The Lobby" is very well connected in DC? In spite of taking a back seat on the Hagel appointment, there seems to be enough noise in the air suggesting that AIPAC isn't exactly pleased by Hagel. Perhaps AIPAC, as with the US "leading from behind" foreign policy strategy, finds that current circumstances (political heat) make it expedient to play it low-key while making moves in private, in 1-on-1 sessions etc. Anyway, we'll see how the Hagel appointment turns out. If the appointment doesn't fail it will show that "The Lobby" isn't omnipotent, but it takes more than one occurrence to suggest anything of real note.

Same goes for "The Wall St. Lobby". It most certainly exists and is powerful, but isn't omnipotent.

I do wish that people like Adelson saw the world a bit differently. For example, I think that promoting Israel's health care system as being one of a few good examples during the US health care debates might've been a positive thing for both Israel's image and for US progressive/liberal resolve. Opinion polls showed that a move (in the debate) in that direction would have been very well received by a majority of the american public.
But the right wing that Adelson hangs with, Gingrich and co., can't be happy with that aspect of Israeli policy, and so it goes...

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. But Hagel is now on message..Chuck Schumer says so:
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:11 AM
Jan 2013

snip*In a statement Tuesday, Schumer said Hagel addressed his concerns over Israel and Iran during a 90-minute Monday meeting at the White House, saying the former Nebraska senator had been “forthcoming and sincere.” Regarding Iran, Schumer said Hagel rejected a containment strategy regarding the country and said the U.S. would do “whatever it takes” to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Planning military contingencies against Iran would be Hagel’s “top priority” as defense secretary, Schumer said.

snip* Moreover, Hagel told Schumer that he backs unilateral sanctions against Iran. On Hezbollah, Hagel pointed to past comments in which he referred to it as a terrorist group. And despite previously calling for direct talks with leaders of Hamas, Hagel said he now believes there should be “no negotiations with Hamas, Hezbollah or any other terrorist group until they renounce violence and recognize Israel’s right to exist.”

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/chuck-schumer-says-hell-support-chuck-hagels-nomination-86215.html

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. Some like to pretend the lobby is a myth, the policies we have appear more acceptable that way.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:27 AM
Jan 2013

And if the lobby is not 100% successful 100% of the time that is more "proof" it's
a myth they yield any power.

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
6. GOP Sen. Cochran will back Hagel
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:53 PM
Jan 2013

<snip>

"Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) on Tuesday became the first Republican to indicate he would vote to confirm Chuck Hagel as defense secretary.

Democrats appear to be lining up behind Hagel’s confirmation, but so far six Repulicans have said they will vote against Obama’s pick.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday he was prepared to place a hold on Hagel’s nomination until Defense Secretary Leon Panetta testifies on the Benghazi attacks. With Democrats holding 55 Senate seats, at least four more Republicans would need to join Cochran to eliminate the threat of a filibuster on Hagel’s nomination."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/01/30/gop-sen-cochran-will-back-hagel/

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
7. MJ Rosenberg's tweet:
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 07:35 PM
Feb 2013

MJ Rosenberg @MJayRosenberg

I spent a couple of hours with Hagel a few years ago. Talked about Israel. Happily, he is lying today & knows it. He'll be a good SeDef.
5:30 PM - 31 Jan 13

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Secret Donors Finance Fig...