Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumLockheed Martin Opens New Office In Israel
BEER SHEVA, Israel, April 9, 2014 Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] Chairman, President and CEO Marillyn Hewson officially opened our newest office in Israel today to support the Corporations growing presence in that important country. The new office further demonstrates the Corporations commitment to supporting the Israeli Defense Force and their Move to the South campaign.
Former Israeli Air Force Brig. Gen. Shelly Gotman was recently appointed as managing director of Israel for the companys Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS) business and will lead the office. Lockheed Martins IS&GS business has been the number one provider of information technology solutions and services to the U.S. government for the past 19 years. It has been growing its international presence with major operations in the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia. Current IS&GS customers include NATO; British air traffic management organization NATS; the Australian Tax office; and the United Kingdom Ministry of Justice.
http://lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2014/april/0409hq-israel.html
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)King_David
(14,851 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)thanks for letting folks know where their jobs are going
King_David
(14,851 posts)They in many countries and investing now in Israel despite BDS .
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)King_David
(14,851 posts)It's been proven the BDS movement is uber antiSemitic ... It's all about Jews with them... Just look at the boycott called against the JEWISH exhibit at unesco .
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)efforts to boycott Israel's occupation of the Palestinians.
I am sure they are thrilled with the move, as much if not more than Bibi...their stock
in trade are killing machines.
It is a dangerous world and they aim to keep it that way.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Only does so for antiSemitic anti Jewish reasons.
Witness the boycott of the Jewish exhibit at unesco .
That's why there are no US companies participating in the BDS Jewish hatefest.
We all know this.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)King_David
(14,851 posts)That's a good rebuttal
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/this-weeks-news/id=1202651783888/Scheindlin%20Preserves%20ApartheidEra%20Suit%20Against%20Companies?mcode=1202615038803&curindex=10&slreturn=20140323235808
Scheindlin Preserves Apartheid-Era Suit Against Companies
Defying the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Scheindlin on Thursday said that the companies still might face liability under the Alien Tort Statute for providing vehicles, computers and other materials that helped the South African government violate international law through torture and extrajudicial killings.
In August 2013, the circuit remanded two cases led by Ntzebesa v. Citigroup, 02-ms-01499, which is part of the multidistrict litigation in In Re South Africa Apartheid Litigation, 02 MDL 1499.
The case was remanded to Scheindlin because the U.S. Supreme Court had held four months earlier that the strong presumption against lawsuits in U.S. courts for actions that occur entirely outside of the United States also applies to the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) (NYLJ, April 18, 2013).
But please keep up with your delusions of victimization.
Israeli
(4,148 posts)" That's why there are no US companies participating in the BDS "
ref : ...
U.S. legal victory for BDS movement
http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/features/economy-of-the-occupation/7962-u-s-legal-victory-for-bds-movement
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)The exhibit was postponed, and there was no boycott. It's been explained to that poster more than a few times, but they just keep on ignoring it.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)US to lose vote at UNESCO over three-year Palestine boycott
Move has prompted new criticism of laws that force funding cutoff for any UN agency with Palestine as a member
November 7, 2013 6:15PM ET
American influence in culture, science and education around the world is facing a high-profile blow Friday, with the United States to be stripped of its voting rights at the United Nations' cultural agency, UNESCO. It would cost the U.S. hundreds of millions of dollars to win its vote back.
The United States hasn't paid its dues to the Paris-based U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in three years in protest over the decision by world governments to make Palestine a UNESCO member in 2011. The Palestinian territories, which are not yet a sovereign state, were granted full membership in UNESCO two years ago.
Under UNESCO rules, the U.S. has until Friday morning to resume funding or it will automatically lose its vote.
The suspension of U.S. contributions, which account for $80 million a year 22 percent of UNESCO's budget brought the agency to the brink of a financial crisis and forced it to cut U.S.-led initiatives such as Holocaust education and tsunami research over the past two years.
It has worried many in Washington that the U.S. is on track to become a toothless UNESCO member with a weakened voice in international programs fighting extremism through education and promoting gender equality and press freedoms.
"We won't be able to have the same clout," said Phyllis Magrab, the Washington-based U.S. national commissioner for UNESCO. "In effect, we (won't) have a full toolbox. We're missing our hammer."
The UNESCO tension has prompted new criticism of U.S. laws that force an automatic funding cutoff for any U.N. agency with Palestine as a member.
The agency may be best known for its program to protect the cultures of the world via its heritage sites, including the Statue of Liberty and Mali's Timbuktu.
But its core mission, as conceived by the U.S., a co-founder of the agency in 1946, was to be an anti-extremist organization. In today's world, it tackles foreign-policy issues such as access to clean water, teaching girls to read, eradicating poverty, promoting freedom of expression and giving people creative-thinking skills to resist violent extremism.
Among UNESCO programs already slashed because of funding shortages is one in Iraq that was intended to help restore proper water facilities. Another was a Holocaust- and genocide-awareness program in Africa to teach about nonviolence, nondiscrimination and ethnic tolerance.
That loss is a particular blow to the U.S., since Holocaust awareness was one of the areas in the organization's agenda that the country aggressively promoted when it rejoined in 2002 after withdrawing for 18 months over differences in vision.
The concern over UNESCO is resonating in the U.S. Congress.
"The United States must not voluntarily forfeit its leadership in the world community," Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., told The Associated Press in an email.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/11/7/us-to-lose-vote-atunescoincursdebts.html
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)they go to Israelis? This has nothing to do with BDS
King_David
(14,851 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)care to explain how that works?
King_David
(14,851 posts)Doesn't equal job losses .
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)to suggest something, but you've given your opinion quite well here thanks
King_David
(14,851 posts)Good luck with that .
Spread the word.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and your opinion is also here for all to see
15. What's good for Israel is good for America
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113462426#post15
I'm sure unemployed Americans would agree
King_David
(14,851 posts)That makes no sense whatsoever to anyone with a passing knowledge or expertise of economics and then you expand and argue on this theory .
I couldn't argue or agree or disagree with some nonsense theory about job losses because it's Mickey Mouse and Goofy nonsense.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)aren't screaming about being bullied. This time you will just ignore your own post that azurnoir pointed out and dive off into the "Micky Mouse & Goofey" retorts.
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)There's this zany new invention called Google where if you don't know what the hell is going on around you, you can go and stick a few words in the search box and enlightenment will be delivered to yr browser. Lockheed Martin is a US defence company that's downsizing severely in the US and at the same time expanding operations overseas. In this case, what's good for Israel isn't good for the US, as there's many American workers out of jobs...
King_David
(14,851 posts)You may not like this but What is good for Israel is good for the USA and this has been reaffirmed many times by our parties representatives in congress.
Lockheed Martin has opened in Australia too and what's good for USA is good for Australia .
The USA will secure here own interests first and foremost every time as it should.
So no it does not make any economic sense that theory , try again.
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)Just blindly repeating the same 'what's good for Israel is good for the US' is kind of lame and not taking you anywhere on the scale of being convincing. A company downsizing in the US and expanding overseas is good for the company and good for workers in the other country, but it isn't good for the unemployed workers in the US. It's not too hard to follow if you put yr mind to it...
King_David
(14,851 posts)Look how much employment this Israeli company has created in the USA by expansion into every city .
The more they boycott them the more they expand.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3272286,00.html
I am in Miami at the moment and Aroma has penetrated every neighborhood .
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)What's good for Israel is good for Israel. Am I wrong on this?
Also you seem to become less enlightened, if ever you were, with each and every passing comment.
Let me help you, King, since there seems to be a disconnect between you and knowledge. Google is a search engine like an old fashioned library card catalog. The only difference is that Google is a card catalog on steroids. With Google, or other search engines, you can search out content that you might not so easily find in a library; finding what you are looking for and educate yourself.
But it doesn't seem that you really want to be educated and would rather start from a position of being uninformed about the world...or at the very least a very narrow and provincial view: myopic really. That's you choice. Since apparently it doesn't appear to be an educated position that I would expect from somebody in the medical field, IMHO, I would defer to ask you where your education of something as simple as Lockheed Martin downsizing American jobs and shifting them overseas is beneficial for America: sound bites aside?
If you meant that it is good for American business interests solely on the basis of profit then perhaps you are not only in the wrong group but also on the wrong website. Perhaps in an insular world that position appears relevant, but to those Americans that lose their jobs so that they can be shifted to an Apartheid state that has been known to spy on us, trash talks our POTUS, embarrasses us on the diplomatic stage and is openly hostile to a captive nation it may not appear as anything like wisdom. It may appear more attuned to the wisdom of Cliven Bundy than any King, King.
So you are free to explain how cutting jobs in the USA to reward Israel, a state run by a group of belligerent right wing assholes, is beneficial for those Americans than now have the privilege of a pink slip and knowing that their jobs won't be coming back.
Oh, and BTW, before you call me a lair or making shit up...
Lockheed Martin Cutting 4,000 Jobs, Closing Plants
This article is from November. So yeah, I guess that this is really good for America.
One other thing, King, I found this article on Google.
Consider yourself schooled.
Shaktimaan
(5,397 posts)So what evidence is there to support the idea that the office opening in Israel has any relationship to the layoffs here? Correlation and causality are two different things.
Is LM hiring Israelis to do the same jobs that were list here? Is this a "US car company moving to Mexico" situation?
Your argument is nonsensical.
King_David
(14,851 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)From the kings article.
http://lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2014/april/0409hq-israel.html
From the article I posted.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/11/14/lockheed-martin-layoffs-closing-plants/
Cutting American jobs resurface in Israel.
So, my argument is actually spot on, and I have done the simplest thing possible. I read the articles before making comments on them.
Perhaps you and the king can try to do the same in the future, and while you are at it try to be a little less nonsensical.
Shaktimaan
(5,397 posts)According to the numbers.
4000 jobs are being lost. Of those half are being lost in three sectors of which only one is the same as the Israeli office's field. So, while you found no evidence to suggest that these lost jobs are in any way the same as those bring created in Israel, you did manage to prove that the vast majority of these job losses are entirely unrelated to the Israeli office, being that they're in completely unrelated fields.
Regarding those losses the article specifically mentions budget cuts as the reason. Nothing about Israel.
So beyond wild speculation do you have any actual proof?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)From the kings article.
http://lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2014/april/0409hq-israel.html
From the article I posted.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/11/14/lockheed-martin-layoffs-closing-plants/
It's hilarious that I can provide examples of job losses in the US IS&GS and creation of jobs in the same IS&GS and you are going to try deflection and spin.
Shaktimaan
(5,397 posts)The article directly lists budget cuts, not outsourcing, as the cause of the losses. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
You showed nothing indicating a link between these two events. Or even that the us jobs and Israeli ones are even similar beyond being in the same general field. Basically you need to show that the Israeli office was opened in order to do work that otherwise would have gone to us workers.
If outsourcing caused these job losses then where's the reporting on it? Has anyone even implied that that's what's happening?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)just happens to decide to cut their US workforce Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS) business and coincidentally, just coincidentally mind you, opens a unit with exactly the same name Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS) business in Israel: which gets 3 billion in US military aid per year.
All purely coincidental.
It's also purely coincidental when US tech companies move their engineering jobs to India or production jobs to China citing budget and competition while cutting their US workfore.
All purely coincidental.
But there is always some corporate bottom feeder that will come along and deny that any of these happenings have any correlation.
Shaktimaan
(5,397 posts)Hey, if there's a reason to think that these cuts are due to outsourcing then why are you the only one who actually thinks so?
Unlike china and India gaining outsourced jobs, the discussion of which has garnered untold numbers of articles, books and movies.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)The zionists of isreal are not our friends.
King_David
(14,851 posts)I'm trying to decipher what that means.
I googled it and a bunch of extremist right wing hate sites such as "Rense " came up.
Who do you mean by "Zionists of Israel"?
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)I just "googled" zionists and did not get any rense.com articles...
https://www.google.com/#q=zionists
King_David
(14,851 posts)Still waiting to hear from you what you meant by "Zionists of Israel"
Who are these people , I know what Rense says when I google that phrase, mostly extremist right wing sites use that phrase .
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)I didn't call you dumb, I said don't play dumb.... big difference, have someone explain it to you.
BTW, what did you search to get rense? My search for zionist did not and even "if" rense did come it my search results for zionists, what would that have to do with anything what so ever?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)When I entered Zionist into Google I did not come back with one rense-related article.
Perhaps the king needs to flush out his history + cookies. Perhaps there have been too many visits to rense and he has a script inserted to draw him there magically.
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)would have a clue...
I even provided him a link, even after asking him his search words he punted.
King_David
(14,851 posts)You used a term u never heard before ,
" Zionists of Israel " and so I googled it and extremist right wing sites such as "Rense " came up.
It's not me playing dumb mister...
Where do you get that term from?
Who is it referring to ?
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)go play a "victim" somewhere else...
King_David
(14,851 posts)I think so...
( ps : please don't tell me what to do ,
"Go play blah blah" , I certainly do not take orders from anyone ever)
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)1rst is wiki
https://www.google.com/#q=zionists+of+israel
King_David
(14,851 posts)"Zionists of Israel are not our friends?"
What does he mean by that then?
Jews?
I'm just asking and he's not answering.
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)learn something. Or would that be telling what to do?
http://zoa.org/
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1st hit: Wikipedia entry for "Zionist"
2nd hit: Jewish Virtual Library
3rd hit: nateuri Karta website. Okay, there's one!
4th hit: haaretz.com article about defining zionism.
5th hit: "True Torah Jews against Zionism." Looks like a Nateuri Karta face group. Already covered.
6th hit: Third World Traveler's page for Israel. Appears to be some flavor of kook site. Is that center-alighed comic sans? Good lord it's like 1995!
7th hit: FInally, the one lonely rense.com article in the list, which tries to explain not all jews are Zionists (which we will have already learned from not one but two Nateuri Karta sites higher on the list. Thanks Rense!)
8th hit: Urban dictionary definition of Zionist.
9th hit: Globalresearch.ca's article about the Oded Yinon Plan. A little froth there, but hardly "right-wing."
10th hit: "Israel Versus Judaism," judging from the pictures of men with thick locks in sleeper chokes by Israeli security forces, I'm guessing another NK front site. As if Israel is hostile toward orthodox Jews, ell oh ell.
11th hit: Juan Cole's article about christian Zionist GOP'ers being feted by Israel. Funny that a man born in the territory that is today Israel can't get in becuase he's an Arab, but Michelle Bachman can come and go as she likes.
12th hit: Middle East forum's article about post-Zionism. Definitely as nasty right-wing site... but as we've covered previously dave, one you approve of and support because it shares the same position as you do (that is, it's nasty and right-wing)
13th hit: Zionist Organization of America homepage.
14th hit: Mideastweb's piece on Zionism. Nasty and right-wing (most Zionist sites ARE, of course) but hardly something you would ever argue against (Again, it's nasty and right-wing, so gets King David's royal seal of approval.
15th hit: Times of Israel article lambasting a presbyterian church for daring criticize Zionism.
16th hit: Amazon page for the book, "Plowshares into Swords: From Zionism to Israel" by Arno J. Mayer. Haven't read it, can't say what it's like.
17th hit: The ADL's page on modern zionism.
18th hit: Appears to be a link to an editorial on nationalinterest.org, about how Arab Israelis are indeed Israelis. Site appears to be down or congested.
19th hit: World Zionist Organization's facebook page.
20th hit: New York Times web-publishing of the article announcing the creation of israel from 1948.
Your pearl-clutching appears to be unwarranted, Davey. But then, it usually is.
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #56)
King_David This message was self-deleted by its author.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)the IAF Levi. Both Lockheed and Boeing didnt want competition and the US government was not particularly interested in underwriting a rival to their own defence industry.
Apparently Lockheed's office in Israel will help to develop part of the technologies inside the flight helmet of the F-35. Some have perceived this as being a bit of a sop to Israelis who may still be feeling resentful over the whole thing:-
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2013/10/15/In-Israel-lingering-bitterness-over-a-failed-fighter-project/UPI-78961381856103/