Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumWhy one student switched sides over BDS
Today, I stand here, as a former supporter of Divestment, to tell you, that I was wrong.
Five months ago, I blindly supported the BDS movement on our campus, I was one of them. I discussed my support of BDS on the radio, many of my friends were in SJP, and the many minority communities I was in, were fully invested in BDS. I even planned last summer to join the campaign against Israel. I was emblematic of many college students across the U.S, being anti-Israel in the name of social justice and equality.
Over the summer, a violent and hateful picture posted to the SJP page was brought to my attention. It was in response to our schools decision to turn down Divestment and it stated Ethnic Cleansing Starts Here a mockery of our school motto and a sign of disrespect to our student body. In the instant I saw the picture, I questioned its hateful motive, so as an opinion writer for the school paper, I set out to interview various Jewish students on campus to get their perspective on the issue. As students opened themselves up to me, I saw that they felt attacked, and isolated on a campus where they should feel safe. I knew in the testimonies I heard, that they felt voiceless. I published the article, stating my change in stance regarding Divestment and condemned the organization for being hateful. I condemned them for reducing Israel to a caricature specific to their narrative. I condemned them for marginalizing students on our campus.
In just 2 days after publishing, I received over 30 messages, calling for my resignation from the paper, calling me a baby killer, a racist apartheid supporter, and other hateful slurs I cant mention right now. I have been threatened on campus and off, online and offline and have lost friendships I valued in the process. Ive lost my sense of safety on our campus, but what Ive lost in taking this important stance, Ive gained in an amazing community through Stand With Us and other Israel advocates, not only within our campus but across the country.
http://www.sdjewishworld.com/2014/12/09/one-student-switched-sides-bds/
BDS bullies in action against Jewish students on campus.
So much to be proud of.
Response to shira (Original post)
Scootaloo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)It's breathless pablum.
But y'know, so long as it helps support the brutal and lethal occupation that you feel so proud of...
shira
(30,109 posts)...against Jewish students on college campuses?
There's a decent response to this question.
How about a solution to the bullying while you're at it?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Nor do I approve of making up false claims of being bullied. And sorry, being ":uncomfortable" with discussion of a brutal policy enacted by a nation's governmetn is nowhere near the same as being "bullied."
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)God it must really kill some to have to admit that Israel is an apartheid state.
Uncomfortable...
Just like Americans have to admit that we are a torture state. One can be uncomfortable about it, but that doesn't change things.
shira
(30,109 posts)You believe that simply pointing out actual apartheid in Lebanon against Palestinians is itself evidence of Israeli apartheid.
Anyone disagreeing with you is also guilty of apartheid.
You said it yourself here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=58262
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Here it its.
Taking another people's land, for use for ones own at the expense of the former, is Apartheid.
Inserting another group of people (over 500k illegal settlers) onto that land is Apartheid.
Having two sets of laws, one (look the other way) for the illegals - one (draconian) for the Palestinians is Apartheid.
Being in a constant state of harassment against the Palestinians, as they do anything to survive, is Apartheid.
Destruction of Palestinian homes, crops, livestock, even life (as f it were sport) is Apartheid.
Looking the other way (IDF clowns) as settlers attack Palestinains and their property then driving the Palestinians off for settler protection is Apartheid.
Reducing the Palestinians living within Israel to "*Arabs" besides being just a tad overtly racist is Apartheid.
Suggesting that "*Israeli Arabs" be forcibly removed from Israel to Palestine...revoking their citizenship, from a politician from the only Democracy in the Mid East is Apartheid.
Forcing Palestinians (aka *Israeli Arabs...aka Bedouin) off off their lands within Israel so as to construct Jewish-only settlements is Apartheid.
Suggesting the annexation of more of the West Bank to Israel is Apartheid.
Cheering this kind of crap on, while attempting to discredit the truth tellers is Apartheid.
shira
(30,109 posts)See? The very mention of Lebanese apartheid is....apartheid to you.
Interestingly, in the middle of what you just quoted from yourself there's this massive fail...
Calling Palestinians god-forbid "Arabs" is racist to you, and worse it's apartheid! Oh the humanity!
Ergo, you have no clue what apartheid is.
============
You don't even realize you defend apartheid constantly here.
After all, you're the one here defending apartheid policy vs. Jews and Xtians who merely wish to pray at their holy sites. Talk about projecting your own defense of apartheid onto others...
Your anti-zionist "analysis" is better suited for clown school.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)In fact you appear, IMHO, to be hyperventilating.
The world has a very good clue what apartheid is, my poor deluded friend, and that is why BDS is growing.
BDS is what Israel and its supporters fear...and for good reason.
The writing is on the wall, and it doesn't look good for apartheid Israel.
shira
(30,109 posts)What you wrote was ridiculous.
Honesty.
Try it.
=========
Maybe stop your defense of Temple Mount apartheid policy against non-Muslims seeking to pray there.
At the very least stop defending Apartheid before you accuse others (falsely) of cheering it on.
=========
Lastly, the BDS movement has been proven over and over again to be racist and supportive of terror against Israelis. I challenge you to state FTR that BDS is not racist and supportive of terror.
You up for that challenge?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)shira
(30,109 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)No amount of lipstick on a pig will change it from being a pig.
shira
(30,109 posts)What I don't get is why you enthusiastically promote such a hateful, racist & fascist, pro-terror, pro-Apartheid movement like BDS, knowing it's rotten to the core. Can you riddle me that one?
If I'm wrong, then please explain.
Do you figure things are so bad you feel you have to work with the nastiest gutter anti-semites in order to oppose Israeli policy? Is the situation really that desperate?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I believe that any explanation that I could give to you would either be;
A. Over your head.
B. Met with resistance and more goal post changing.
C. Met with resistance and more endless queries.
D. All of the above.
shira
(30,109 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I think some men get very defensive when it is pointed out how much shit women have to put up with in their lives.
I think there are white people who get very uncomfortable when there is talk of racial injustice in the United States.
I think there's a number of straight people who get edgy when talk turns to LGBT rights and straight privilege.
I think there are some number of Jews who are upset by talk of the oppression of Palestinians by Israel.
These topics don't target the people who are getting defensive and angry over it. They are not being "bullied," though they may make that claim, because they do feel uncomfortable with these topics being broached. Why? Well, in these topics, the people getting defensive identify on some level with the caste doing the oppression, even if they personally do not support or endorse the wrongs being done by that caste (though of course, some might.)
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Would that be another category similar to the ones you listed?
shira
(30,109 posts)There certainly are, just as there are anti-Zionists who are upset hearing of Jews being victims of Palestinian or Arab terror.
According to the anti-Zio playbook, only Palestinians can be victims while Jews are the oppressors. The script demands that it has to be that way....always.
==================
You once wrote that Holocaust survivors were invaders & thieves, basically leading the way as oppressors of Palestinians. I thought that was maybe one of the most vile things you ever wrote here.
That's not simple "talk" about oppression of people It's demonization.
Jews get upset when people "talk" like that.
==================
Using the words genocide, apartheid, colonialism, Jewish supremacy and white nationalism to describe Zionism is not "talk either".
It's straight up Jew-baiting.
==================
Calling for Israel's end, saying it never should have come about, that Jews have no right to their own state in their historic indigenous homeland, that they stole it all from the Palestinians who have exclusive rights to the land....means we aren't just talking about oppression of Palestinians. It's way more than that.
Everyone knows it's way more than simple "talk" about some issues.
It's about ending Israel. All the "criticisms" are a means to an end. These "criticisms" are not meant to improve Israel's behavior in order to make it a model Western democracy. They are meant to delegitimize the Jewish state and bring it down altogether....along with its Jews. Once a totalitarian racist Palestine ruled by Hamas (or worse) is created on the ruins of what was once Israel, it's "tough shit" for Jews who would then be in the very same position they were in as victims for the past 2000 years prior to 1948.
Everyone knows what would happen to the Jews of Israel with Hamas in charge there. And let's be real, that's exactly what anti-Zionists want. They make that clear when they support or defend Hamas' rocket attacks or defend the recent Jerusalem synagogue massacre as merely Palestinians fighting back.
That's what upsets Jews and makes them uncomfortable.
We know what this "talk" about oppression of Palestinians really is. It's Jew-hatred posing as human rights activism. Even David Duke FFS sees himself as a human rights advocate first and foremost.
We've been down this road before. For the last 2000 years. Anti-Zionists look, smell, and talk just like the Jews' tormentors of the past 20 centuries. We're experts at figuring out where we stand with those who hate us and/or want us dead. You can't put lipstick on the anti-zionist pig & think you're fooling us.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)What about the article makes you call it breathless pablum?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)what is really very interesting is that for all he claims to have been an avid supporter of all things Palestinian absolutely nothing in his writing history at the Daily Aztec would indicate that, but we are to believe that one poster he found distasteful totally and completely turned him around, what it did do was get him published in Times of Israel and the publication we see here in this OP, virtually all 3 are the same
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/author/anthony-berteaux/
list of previous and current writings for Daily Aztec
http://www.thedailyaztec.com/author/aberteaux/
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Do you think he wasn't really an avid supporter and just made this up to get published in the Times of Israel and elsewhere?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and it also seems his claims have gotten him a smidgen of notice but he also seems to be writing the article over and over
a subsequent search also showed this
http://www.standwithus.com/news/article.asp?id=3662
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That is to say - do you think he ever actually was a fervent supporter of Palestine in the first place or do you think he just made that up to help get noticed?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)all such "I've seen the light" instant converts on just about any subject
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Especially considering he is still only just a sophomore in college.
King_David
(14,851 posts)How they used to once be supporters of Israel but not anymore.
Maybe the same kind of phenomenon.
Maybe as Azurnoir claims their support wasn't very "deep" to begin with.
Maybe....
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I do know that freshman-sophomore years in college are generally "figuring things out" time in terms of where one stands on various issues.