Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri May 11, 2012, 10:09 AM May 2012

With legal questions looming, Charlotte considers same-sex benefits

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/11/3232260/with-legal-questions-looming-charlotte.html

Some Charlotte City Council members said they are prepared next month to approve offering same-sex benefits for employees, despite questions whether it would be legal in the wake of Tuesday’s passage of Amendment One.

On Wednesday, Charlotte City Manager Curt Walton recommended the city offer for the first time benefits to same-sex partners. Walton said the city was pursuing the change so the city would be competitive with the private sector in attracting and retaining employees.

But during Wednesday’s budget meeting, Democrat Michael Barnes asked whether the city should move forward, given the questions about what will be legal under Amendment One.

During the debate before Tuesday’s vote, critics of the amendment said it would prohibit same-sex benefits and other domestic partnership benefits currently offered by public employers.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/11/3232260/with-legal-questions-looming-charlotte.html#storylink=cpy
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With legal questions looming, Charlotte considers same-sex benefits (Original Post) xchrom May 2012 OP
This is going to end up in the courts and cost North Carolina a lot of money the state can't afford. yardwork May 2012 #1
You spelled stupid wrong in this case... WillParkinson May 2012 #2

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
1. This is going to end up in the courts and cost North Carolina a lot of money the state can't afford.
Fri May 11, 2012, 10:33 AM
May 2012

Stupid stupid stupid.

WillParkinson

(16,862 posts)
2. You spelled stupid wrong in this case...
Fri May 11, 2012, 12:15 PM
May 2012

It's "Republican, Republican, Republican".

Though your spelling is the most widely accepted.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»With legal questions loom...