Dearest Conservatives, There's Nothing "Delusional" About Being Trans
By Harry Cheadle
Chelsea Mannings declaration yesterday that she didnt want to be referred to as Bradley anymore and would like to live as a woman from now on instantly made her the most famous transgender person in the world. It also forced people to deal with the idea that some people feel like they are a man in a womans body, a woman in a mans body, or a version of gender that doesnt fit into the traditional male-female binary. This is not a new phenomenonthose who are neither precisely men nor women have existed across cultures and eras and have been both venerated and persecuted over the centuries. The simplest and most humane way to treat trans people is to just treat them as people, refer to them as the gender they want to be referred to as, and accept that unless youre having sex with someone, it doesnt matter what his or her genitals look like.
For people who havent had much exposure to trans people, however, Mannings announcement was controversial or confusing. (Even though it was already known that Manning was transgender.) The ultra-cis folks at Fox & Friends were all like, Whaaaat? A man wants to be a woman? That is bizarre and I dont think anyone understands whats going on! Other media outlets were reportedly struggling with which pronoun to use when referring to Manning. (Its not that hard, guys. The VICE style guide says, If someone is transgender or a transvestite, use the pronoun of his or her preferred gender.)
Fox and Friends bewilderment is certainly insensitive but using the wrong pronoun or admitting that you dont understand transgender issues isnt all that vicious or transphobic, necessarily. Enter the National Reviews Kevin D. Williamson, who just wrote a post titled Bradley Manning Is Not a Woman and subtitled Pronouns and delusions do not trump biology.
As youd expect from the National Review, Williamson slathers his poisonous antitrans BS with a heavy coat of intellectualism: he references famous cross-dressers in French and Roman history (naturally omitting any mention of socially accepted third genders in non-Western cultures), splits a bunch of hairs looking at the linguistic roots of the word gender, and extensively quotes Paul McHugh, who is probably the most prominent antitrans academic in America. (McHugh is despised by the trans community and has been criticized for not knowing what hes talking about when it comes to sexuality and gender.)
more
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/dearest-conservatives-theres-nothing-delusional-about-being