Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumThe Kentucky Gay Marriage Decision Is Another Hilarious Swipe at Scalia
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/02/12/kentucky_gay_marriage_scalia_would_hate_this_ruling.htmlBe careful what you predict, Justice Scalia.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia famously enjoys throwing temper tantrums when he winds up in dissent, predicting a cascade of terrible consequences that will flow from the majoritys ruling. Usually, his prophecies are ridiculously overblown. But when it comes to gay rights, Scalia has a perfect record for anticipating each rulings consequences. He swore that Romer would lead to Lawrence, that Lawrence would lead to Windsorand he was so convinced that Windsor would lead to nationwide same-sex marriage that he penned a draft of what the opinion striking down all gay marriage bans might look like.
Now, for the second time in two months, a federal judge has taken Scalia at his word and struck down state-level anti-gay laws. This time, the unlikely state is Kentucky, and the judge is John G. Heyburn, a George H.W. Bush appointee recommended by Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell. Heyburns opinion mostly follows the emerging pattern of these kinds of rulings: He wavers on the scrutiny question, finds that the law was driven by anti-gay animus, and strikes it on Equal Protection grounds. The ruling itself is narrow; Heyburn was only asked to invalidate the portion of Kentuckys law that bans recognition of out-of-state gay marriages. But the judge added that should the entire ban be challenged, there is no doubt that Windsor and this courts analysis would likely hold it unconstitutional.
By now, an opinion like this is fairly predictable. It comes as a pleasant surprise, then, to see Heyburn channeling his inner Judge Robert Shelby and sticking his thumb directly in Scalias eye. In Scalias Windsor dissent, the justice decried overly broad, deliberately transposable passages expounding the federal Defense of Marriage Acts unconstitutionality. How easy it is, Scalia snorted, indeed how inevitable, to reach the same conclusion [as the court in Windsor] with regard to state laws denying same-sex couples marital status. Then he illustrated for the world just how easy it would be to apply Windsors logic to state-level gay marriage bans, indignantly substituting a few key words:
DOMA This state law tells those couples, and all the world, that their otherwise valid marriages relationships are unworthy of federal state recognition. This places same-sex couples in an unstable position of being in a second-tier marriage relationship. The differentiation demeans the couple, whose moral and sexual choices the Constitution protects, see Lawrence
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 984 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Kentucky Gay Marriage Decision Is Another Hilarious Swipe at Scalia (Original Post)
xchrom
Feb 2014
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. Good. Progress is slow but certain.
I am pleased to see my country attempting to live up to its founding ideals ... liberty and justice for all.
-Laelth
rock
(13,218 posts)2. Scalia is available for children's parties
He doesn't even require a red nose nor a wig. (Sarcasm. Really!?)
William769
(55,145 posts)3. Good!
And thanks for your excellent OP yesterday in "General discussion".