Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumYou can't cut open pregnant women because you disagree with their choices
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/23/pregnant-women-forced-c-sectionYou can't cut open pregnant women because you disagree with their choices
The same thinking behind 'personhood' arguments is being used to force pregnant women to have surgery against their will
Jessica Valenti
theguardian.com
Friday 23 May 2014 07.30 EDT
Having a doctor perform surgery on you without permission literally cutting into you while you protest is the stuff of which horror movies are made. Yet that's just what happened to 35-year-old Rinat Dray when a doctor at Staten Island University Hospital performed a C-section on the Brooklyn mother, against her will and verbal protests...
...The National Advocates for Pregnant Women compiled a report of 413 cases between 1973 and 2005 in which pregnant women strictly because they were pregnant had their physical liberty infringed upon (including 30 incidents of forced C-sections or other medical interventions).
When Laura Pemberton refused a C-section in Florida in 1996, for example, she was taken into custody by a sheriff and state's attorney who showed up at her house. Her legs were strapped and she was forced to go to the hospital for surgery. Tellingly, she was given no representation but a lawyer was appointed to her fetus. When Pemberton later sued for civil rights violations, the US district court in Florida ruled against her, saying that her rights were outweighed by the state's interest "in preserving the life of the unborn child".
For women who managed to avoid forced surgery, there are other nightmares that await. Melissa Rowland was pregnant with twins when she rejected her doctor's advice to have a C-section. After she gave birth to a girl and a stillborn boy, she was arrested and charged with murder. (Treating women as criminals for what they do during pregnancy is not uncommon Dray was told that refusing the C-section was child abuse and that her child would be taken away from her.) ....
MORE at above link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1059 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can't cut open pregnant women because you disagree with their choices (Original Post)
theHandpuppet
May 2014
OP
CrispyQ
(36,421 posts)1. We are going backwards at a frightening rate. -nt
Lunacee_2013
(529 posts)2. O.M.G.
That's all I can say, really, those stories sound like nightmares! God, I hope I never get pregnant. No bio-kids for me, no thanks! I think I'll just do adoption if I want a child.