Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumDoctors Are Examining Your Genitals for No Reason
By Amanda Hess
This thing does not need to be such a big part of your life.
When a girl becomes a woman, she is initiated into a bizarre and mysterious annual ritual. She takes off her clothes, sticks her arms through a backless medical gown, reclines on an examination table, and spreads her legs. A doctor fits her feet into a pair of stirrups, looks at her genitals, sticks a cold metal speculum into her vagina, cranks it open, and peers in. When the speculum is removed, the doctor inserts a finger or two, and pokes around to feel the womans internal organs. Sometimes, the fingers examine her rectum, too.
In 2010, doctors performed 62.8 million of these routine pelvic examinations on women across America. In total, gynecological screenings cost the U.S. $2.6 billion every year. And yet, a new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine reports that there is no established medical justification for the annual procedure. After scouring nearly 70 years of pelvic exam studies, conducted from 1946 to 2014, the researchers found no evidence that they lead to any reduction in morbidity or mortality of any condition among women. In light of the study, the American College of Physicians, a national organization of internists, has crafted a new set of guidelines warning doctors that exams conducted on otherwise symptomless women can subject patients to unnecessary worry and follow-up and can cause anxiety, discomfort, pain, and embarrassment, especially in women who have a history of sexual abuse.
In an editorial also published in Annals, internists George Sawaya and Vanessa Jacoby of the University of CaliforniaSan Francisco, conclude that the pelvic examination has become more of a ritual than an evidence-based practice. Sawaya told me that the routine pelvic exam is such "a foundational cornerstone" of gynecology, it's hard to even trace its origins. The new report urging doctors to reverse course will be "very controversial," Sawaya says. "I expect a lot of physicians to raise their eyebrows."
Just two years ago, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists admitted that no evidence supports or refutes the annual pelvic examination
for the asymptomatic, low-risk patient. Nevertheless, ACOG reupped its endorsement of the exam, writing that it seems logical. The procedurewhich is routinely initiated early in a womans teen years and conducted annuallycan aid in establishing the clinicianpatient relationship and provide an excellent opportunity to counsel patients about maintaining a healthy lifestyle and minimizing health risks, ACOG reported. In other words, according to ACOG, while the annual pelvic exam might not be worthwhile in and of itself, it can be a useful device for bringing a woman to her doctor every year to get some necessary information about her reproductive health.
Link:http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/06/30/pelvic_exam_study_annual_well_woman_exams_have_no_medical_basis.html?google_editors_picks=true
elleng
(130,872 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)I think women are capable of deciding when they need to see a doctor for all of the above.
But the idea of going through this annually - when one has no complaint or need - is a bit unnecessary.
Do men with no symptoms report to the doctor annually for a genital exam?
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)Just like there is a reason to get a PAP smear every 3 years or whatever is recommended for your age group. But now and then you figure out that doctors do things because "this is the way we've always done it".
It wasn't so long ago that women could not have the father of their child in the delivery room with them. That change didn't happen till patients pushed for it.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Much of what passes for routine medical care in this country is mostly shamanistic ritual.
Interestingly enough, whenever anyone here points out that mammograms don't really save lives, dozens of women here will come on to assert strongly that THEY are one of the minority for whom a mammogram was lifesaving. Either the ones with the false positives never post here, or (more likely) most women who've had a false positive and perhaps even surgery and chemo as a result, NEVER learn that they were misled.
Same with the whole prostate cancer thing.
It's a bit like the chicken and the egg quandary. Do people who go to doctors often and use lots of medical services do so because they really need them? Or do they wind up being diagnosed with things only because they go to the doctor.
I don't deny the existence of disease, but I have often notice how many people are very invested in their illness, in defining themselves as someone who is sick, has some particular condition that requires a lot of care.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)I can't say that my first reaction when I saw this story in the paper this morning wasn't "Yippee!!" - but I think I'll see what my internist says.
elleng
(130,872 posts)which I've been fortunate to avoid. Of course I know about STDs, and pregnancy related stuff, but some pre-cancerous conditions good for doc to watch, imo.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,632 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)It's just asserting that it may not be medically justified and as the article points out, can have a negative consequence because women with a history of sexual abuse may avoid the gynecologist altogether because of discomfort with this exam.
Establishing the clinician-patient relationship is a ridiculous excuse. "Hi, I'm Dr. Smith and I'd like to establish our relationship by having you put your legs in stirrups and stick a cold metal object in you because it's the best way for me to talk about your lifestyle and health risks."
If these are the best reasons ACOG can come up with to recommend annual pelvic exams, they need to take their heads out of their asses and their speculums out of women's vaginas.