USCCB's latest attack on the HHS Contraceptive Mandate
http://www.usccb.org/news/2014/14-164.cfm
USCCB General Counsel Submits Comments on Latest Version of HHS Contraceptive Mandate
October 8, 2014
WASHINGTONThe U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) submitted comments October 8 to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and two other federal agencies on the Obama administrations latest version of Rules on Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as the HHS contraceptive mandate. The comments were submitted by Anthony Picarello, USCCB general counsel, and Michael Moses, associate general counsel.
The Administration issued these proposals and invited public comment in late August in response to the U.S. Supreme Courts Hobby Lobby decision, which found that the existing mandate violates the religious freedom of some closely-held for-profit companies such as family-owned businesses under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The new proposals consist of interim final rules slightly modifying the governments accommodation for nonprofit religious organizations not exempted from the mandate, and proposed rules on extending this accommodation to closely-held for-profit companies. The USCCB commented on both proposals.
Regarding the interim final rules, Picarello and Moses wrote that the mandate continues to substantially burden the religious liberty of stakeholders with religious objections to the mandated coverage. Because it does not further a compelling government interest by the means least restrictive of religious exercise, the mandate continues to violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
They noted that the interim final rules do not change the mandate itself, or its extremely narrow exemption, offered chiefly to churches but not to social service and other religious organizations. Religious organizations that fall on the non-exempt side of the religious gerrymander include those which contribute most visibly to the common good through the provision of health, educational, and social services, they noted. They added that the rules do not provide an exemption or even accommodation for the vast majority of individual and institutional stakeholders with religious or moral objections to contraceptive coverage..... MORE at link provided above.