Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,055 posts)
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 11:43 AM Apr 2015

Today in Herstory: Women-Only Public Transit Cars Gain Traction in NYC (1april 1909)


Today in Herstory: Women-Only Public Transit Cars Gain Traction in NYC

April 1, 1909: Women-only cars on the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad’s “Hudson Tube” route through the McAdoo Tunnel from 23rd Street in Manhattan to Hoboken, New Jersey, are proving popular.



Today’s ridership is up by 50% (3,000 vs. 2,000) over yesterday’s test run. Already being referred to as “Suffragette Cars” (a derisive term local suffragists dislike) or “Merry Widow Cars,” they are the last in each train during rush hours, from 7 to 9 in the morning and 4:30 to 7:00 in the evening. Whether the special cars will be adopted by the five-year-old Interborough Rapid Transit Company’s subway system and be established on New York City routes is still unknown, though it seems doubtful. Hearings were held two weeks ago and with the exception of the Women’s Municipal League, host for the discussion, there was strong opposition.

Ida Husted Harper, author of “The Life and Work of Susan B. Anthony,” acknowledged that there were substantial problems for commuters: “It is an outrage for people to be subjected to what they have to endure in the way of transportation in New York.” But she also said:
I am opposed to the plan principally because by setting aside one car for women, men would consider that all the rest of the train belonged to them. Then, when the overflow from this segregated car tried to get into the others, the men would put up the cry that women were encroaching on their domain. We are hearing entirely too much nowadays about ‘women’s invasion.’
. . . . .

Lillie Devereaux Blake, veteran suffragist and President of the Legislative League, said of the proposal:
I am opposed to it. I don’t think our New York men are such beasts that we can’t sit in the same car with them. I like men. Of course, they don’t give us all we want them to. They don’t let us vote, for instance, but they will in good time and even now they’re pretty good to us. I think it would be most unpleasant if we had a car to ourselves.

Florence Kelley, Secretary of the National Consumers League, testified that: “The last thing in the world women want is to be segregated.” The experiment will continue to see if its popularity lasts.

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/04/01/today-in-herstory-women-only-public-transit-cars-gain-traction-in-nyc/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Today in Herstory: Women-Only Public Transit Cars Gain Traction in NYC (1april 1909) (Original Post) niyad Apr 2015 OP
seems it only lasted a few months... riversedge Apr 2015 #1
thank you for that update. niyad Apr 2015 #2

riversedge

(70,078 posts)
1. seems it only lasted a few months...
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 12:01 PM
Apr 2015

Glad to see the leader women of day speak out against it..segregation in never a good idea (welll--except bathrooms).


UPDATE: Though initially popular, the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad’s women-only cars saw ridership decline and the experiment lasted only until July 1st. They were never adopted by New York’s subway system, though the Women’s Municipal League tried to get the Public Service Commission to order it. On August 3, 1909, the Public Service Commission voted 2-1 against ordering the Interborough Rapid Transit Company to have a special car for women on all express trains during rush hours and cited the fact that they had not proven successful on the Hoboken run.

Commissioner Eustis, the one commission member who though the idea should at least be given a trial, admitted that the public was divided over the issue: “Almost an equal number of people [to those advocating women's cars] stated that men are the best protection that women have in a crowded car and that they prefer to ride in cars where men and women are together. That while there are rare occasions where some brute will take advantage of the situation to insult a lady, on the other hand the gentlemen are the best protection the ladies have against such conduct.”
The following two tabs change content below.

....................

niyad

(113,055 posts)
2. thank you for that update.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 12:06 PM
Apr 2015

japan and several other countries have these segregated cars:


» Japan’s ‘Women Only’ Train Cars: Is it a Crime for Men to Ride?


Women-only cars on Japan’s railways have existed in some form or other for more than 50 years, with “hana densha” (lit. “flower train”) carriages originally being introduced as a way of keeping female students safe from the advances of lecherous men during the peak hours. Now considered by many to be a vital part of many inner-city rail services, the train car closest to the driver’s cabin is often reserved for females only and is clearly marked both at boarding locations on the platform and inside the train itself.

Many unwitting foreign males have no doubt hopped on board these carriages during rush hours without realising it. Although foreigners usually escape relatively unscathed, when native Japanese men dare to cross that pink line and invade the sanctity of the josei senyou sharyou (women-only carriage), more often than not they are berated by the women on board until they alight or switch cars.

. . .

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2013/02/27/japans-women-only-train-cars-is-it-a-crime-for-men-to-ride/

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Today in Herstory: Women-...