Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,052 posts)
Fri May 1, 2015, 06:26 PM May 2015

House Reverses DC Law Banning Reproductive Health Discrimination by Employers

(and the insane, self-serving, hate-filled war on women continues apace)


House Reverses DC Law Banning Reproductive Health Discrimination by Employers


The US House of Representatives voted Thursday night to overturn a Washington, DC, law that makes it illegal for employers to retaliate against employees who use their insurance to cover procedures like in-vitro fertilization or abortion and contraception like birth control pills and IUDs for themselves, their spouses, or their children.






The District’s council passed the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act last year. The original legislation looked to protect employees from discrimination based on their reproductive health choices. Overturning the law would not only lead to discrimination against those who receive birth control, abortions, or in-vitro fertilization, it could also affect their spouses or parents. If this House ban would become law, an employer could discriminate against an employee if they, or their dependents under their health coverage, receives these reproductive health services.

“This is Hobby Lobby on steroids,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said, referencing the Supreme Court decision that essentially gave permission to some employers to not provide contraception as a part of the company’s health insurance plans. “Republicans need to recognize that your own health-care choices are not your boss’s business.” Feminist leaders agree, calling the vote an attack on women. “This is a new low. It’s beyond outrageous,” said Feminist Majority Foundation president Eleanor Smeal. “The so-called ‘small government’ folks now want employers to invade the privacy of their employees and their families’ medical records.”

“This bill would make it open season for bosses to dig into their employees’ reproductive health practices and fire women for taking birth control or having an abortion,” said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, in a statement. “This is just the latest in a slew of bills to give employers and businesses the right to discriminate against LGBT people, women, and others. This is dangerous, misguided, and deeply unpopular, and it’s outrageous that Congress is spending its time trying to pass this kind of legislation.” She called the vote “deeply troubling.”

Although Congress has the power to overturn a law passed by the DC council, the House hasn’t voted to do so in 23 years. Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) introduced the House version of the measure and Sen. Ted Cruz introduced the measure in the Senate. The House vote was nearly a straight party-lines vote, except with 13 Republicans voting against the measure and three Democrats voting for it. The Senate and President both need to approve this measure in order for the DC law to be overturned, but President Barack Obama said the measure would have “the unacceptable effect of undermining the will of District of Columbia citizens” and has already issued a veto threat.

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/01/house-reverses-dc-law-banning-reproductive-health-discrimination-by-employers/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Reverses DC Law Banning Reproductive Health Discrimination by Employers (Original Post) niyad May 2015 OP
How in fuck is this not unconstitutional.... Novara May 2015 #1
sadly, who, exactly, is going to challenge them, and which court will enforce it? niyad May 2015 #4
How about the ACLU? Novara May 2015 #5
quite possibly. but, I don't hold out much hope for the courts these days. niyad May 2015 #6
let them go TO FAR & see them WITHER into history. pansypoo53219 May 2015 #2
they passed "TOO FAR" a very long time ago, and continue to get worse, without letup. niyad May 2015 #3

Novara

(5,821 posts)
1. How in fuck is this not unconstitutional....
Fri May 1, 2015, 07:39 PM
May 2015

....under the Due Process clause of the 14th amendment?

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»House Reverses DC Law Ban...