Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumNew Obama administration guidance aims to improve contraceptive coverage
New Obama administration guidance aims to improve contraceptive coverage
On May 11, the federal government issued expanded guidance for private health plans about how to implement the Affordable Care Acts requirement to cover dozens of preventive care servicesincluding the full range of contraceptive methods, services and counselingwithout any out-of-pocket costs, such as copayments and deductibles. The guidance comes in the wake of national studies by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the National Womens Law Center (NWLC) showing that many insurance plans have not been fully complying with the ACAs contraceptive coverage guarantee and other coverage requirements. Key points include:
Closing loopholes: Most notably, the new federal guidance clarifies that the contraceptive coverage guarantee encompasses every distinct contraceptive method used by women and lists 18 methods as identified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Two additional methods, vasectomy and male condoms, are not included in the federal guidance because they are used by men and have been determined by federal officials to fall outside the legal scope of the ACAs provision.) Prior federal guidance from February 2013 had not clearly defined the full range of methods, and the national studies identified numerous plans that failed to fully cover certain methods.
In some cases, insurers excluded specific methods, such as the vaginal ring, the patch, the implant or the copper IUD; several justified those exclusions by incorrectly claiming that they were medically equivalent to other methodsfor example, that the ring and patch were equivalent to certain generic oral contraceptives. In other cases, insurers limited their coverage to generic contraceptive products, even in cases where a brand-name product had no generic equivalent; there are no generic IUDs on the U.S. market, for example.
Ensuring coverage for related services and dependents: The new guidance also puts health insurers on notice that they must fully cover all clinical services needed for provision of the contraceptive method. One of the national studies, for example, had identified coverage limits on ultrasounds to assess proper placement of an IUD and even on anesthesia for sterilization. In addition, insurers were reminded that the preventive services coverage requirements apply to all plan enrollees, including those enrolled as dependents; several plans identified by the NWLC, for example, had excluded coverage of maternity care or sterilization for dependents.
Limiting cost-cutting techniques: Insurers were also given further guidance on what they can and cannot do when using so-called reasonable medical management techniques, such as drug formularies, prior authorization and step therapy (requiring women to try one service or product before covering a more expensive one). They may use such techniques only within a method category (e.g., to promote one hormonal IUD over another), but not across method categories (e.g., to promote oral contraceptives over IUDs). The guidance also provides more details about the waiver process that insurers must have in place if they do use such techniques.
More
http://eepurl.com/bm5Dj5
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 888 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post