Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 07:03 AM Mar 2014

Topless feminist at Stormont: 'Indecent and shameful' ... bare-chested speech sparks unionist anger

The Belfast Telegraph (Northern Ireland)
10 March 2014
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/topless-feminist-at-stormont-indecent-and-shameful-barechested-speech-sparks-unionist-anger-30078171.html

Topless feminist at Stormont: 'Indecent and shameful' ... bare-chested speech sparks unionist anger
By Joanne Sweeney


A Stormont event at which a young woman went “barefoot and bare-chested” was blasted last night as “shameful” by unionists.

But Cara Park (32) — one of 25 women speakers marking International Women’s Day at Parliament Buildings — said she couldn’t understand how a nipple could be seen as offensive...

...“My nudity was a statement, it was a very considered thing. It was to do with my freedom to be a feminist and to express myself physically as a woman without being discriminated against.

“I think women should be allowed to be barechested, I don’t think that other women have a problem with it. My breasts are my own, that’s me in my natural state and I think I should be allowed to be in my natural state.”.... MORE

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Topless feminist at Stormont: 'Indecent and shameful' ... bare-chested speech sparks unionist anger (Original Post) theHandpuppet Mar 2014 OP
So the sight of boobs upset the unionists, no surprise pennylane100 Mar 2014 #1
Is there anything that doesn't upset the unionists? theHandpuppet Mar 2014 #3
Breasts are good. n/t Laelth Mar 2014 #2
OK, so we know that her breasts were visible. But do we know anything about what she Squinch Mar 2014 #4

pennylane100

(3,425 posts)
1. So the sight of boobs upset the unionists, no surprise
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 08:14 AM
Mar 2014

and I bet the Catholics were not thrilled either.

I understand that their appearance achieved their goal and got people's attention but I doubt if it was the kind of attention that would be of any use. However, regardless of the result, these women have guts.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
3. Is there anything that doesn't upset the unionists?
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 09:01 AM
Mar 2014

Though I haven't really made up my mind about how effective this was as a statement.

On the other hand, I'd prefer that a lot of men put their shirts back ON. If you've ever seen an American sporting event (esp. football) you'd know what I mean.

Squinch

(50,911 posts)
4. OK, so we know that her breasts were visible. But do we know anything about what she
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:45 PM
Mar 2014

said?

Well, no. Not even mentioned in the article.

It may not be the most effective way to get your point across.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Topless feminist at Storm...