Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have any of you undergone heart catheritization? (Original Post) pscot Apr 2014 OP
22 years ago, yes. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #1
Not as invasive as a bypass Warpy Apr 2014 #8
In my case, things didn't go so smoothly. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #11
Yes, that's why they scare everybody to death when they sign consent Warpy Apr 2014 #12
A piece of cake if your doctor knows what they are doing. Frustratedlady Apr 2014 #2
We all hope our doctors know what they're doing, don't we. pscot Apr 2014 #6
Well, I'll tell you if they forget Warpy Apr 2014 #9
My mother did and everything worked out just fine Rhiannon12866 Apr 2014 #3
A couple of years ago YarnAddict Apr 2014 #4
I've *watched* a lot of them MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #5
Some of our docs brought in CDs to play Warpy Apr 2014 #10
Yeah, it's a piece of cake Ron Obvious Apr 2014 #7
I had it last November. Jane Austin Apr 2014 #13
My sister went through several of them some years back. SheilaT Apr 2014 #14
Thanks to all pscot Apr 2014 #15

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. 22 years ago, yes.
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 03:20 PM
Apr 2014

It's invasive as hell, but really pretty safe. It was somewhat less save in the era in which I underwent it.

Warpy

(111,173 posts)
8. Not as invasive as a bypass
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:19 PM
Apr 2014

It won't make anyone's day, but local anesthesia plus IV drugs are safer than general anesthesia and people usually do fine with them. We always had to recite a list of scary complications but in 13 years on a heart unit, I never saw any of them but pseudo aneurysms at the insertion site, something technology has pretty much taken care of now that they use pressure cuffs instead of either large clamps or (40 years ago) our fists to make sure the artery wouldn't let go after we pulled the insertion sheath.

I won't say the OP has nothing to worry about, but the statistics are all on his side and sometimes we just have to go with that.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
11. In my case, things didn't go so smoothly.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 11:45 AM
Apr 2014

My angioplasty went bad when a coronary urtery ruptured in mid-procedure, resulting in my undergoing an emergency bypass that I nearly didn't survive. When I next became conscious, I had circular burn marks all over my thorax from the shock pads they had applied to jolt me out of fibrillation.

Warpy

(111,173 posts)
12. Yes, that's why they scare everybody to death when they sign consent
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 03:52 PM
Apr 2014

I was lucky. Pseudoaneurysm in the groin was the worst I saw. It required surgical repair. It also happened mostly when the docs pulled the sheath. Nurses had a better record, so they eventually had us do all of them.

I'm glad you're still with us.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
2. A piece of cake if your doctor knows what they are doing.
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 03:25 PM
Apr 2014

I've had several and only one was a problem. That was when they hit a nerve when entering the groin. Otherwise, the only problem I had was being allergic to the dye, but they can bring that down pretty quickly.

This last time, I was so busy with the hives, I didn't know they had put in the stents. It is very interesting and a miracle. Good luck.

Warpy

(111,173 posts)
9. Well, I'll tell you if they forget
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:27 PM
Apr 2014

Feeling flushed and prickly when the dye goes in is normal. You need to tell them if you have chest pain, cold sweat, nausea, itching, or shortness of breath so they can deal with those before proceeding. That's why you're really groggy but semi awake during the procedure, so you can tell them if something is starting to feel really weird.

Rhiannon12866

(204,812 posts)
3. My mother did and everything worked out just fine
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 04:19 PM
Apr 2014

The only issue was some short term effects because it was determined she was allergic to the dye they used. Best of luck with this...

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
4. A couple of years ago
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 05:47 PM
Apr 2014

It wasn't as bad as I expected. I had some problems, but that was because I have such crappy blood vessels. First, the IV needle BENT inside my vein--very uncomfortable. The nurse said she had never seen that happen before. Then, the doc had trouble getting the catheter in my blood vessel. He finally did, but it took longer than it should have.

After the procedure you have to lie very still for quite a while, so as not to dislodge the clot. A friend of mine had a problem with that because he has back problems, and the position was quite uncomfortable.

Other than those little things, it wasn't bad at all.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. I've *watched* a lot of them
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 06:01 PM
Apr 2014

Mostly on newborns and infants, at Boston Children's Hospital about 20 years ago. Caths on children are actually much more serious, invasive, and take hours.

In any case, even on kids with serious heart defects, these were pretty boring, routine procedures. People who haven't seen surgery or procedures like caths tend to think that it's a great life-or-death adventure with much drama, but it's actually really boring and bad things rarely happen unless a patient is quite sick/hurt.

Good luck!

Warpy

(111,173 posts)
10. Some of our docs brought in CDs to play
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:29 PM
Apr 2014

but yes, stuff that used to be heroics has gotten really rooutine.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
7. Yeah, it's a piece of cake
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 07:07 PM
Apr 2014

They inject you with a dye and then hook you up to a computer. You don't feel anything or suffer any kind of discomfort, other than the nervousness about what they might find.

After it, you have to lie flat on your back with your head slightly elevated for four hours. That's just boring and time crawls.

I had mine 18 months ago.

Jane Austin

(9,199 posts)
13. I had it last November.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:36 PM
Apr 2014

If you are lucky you will have a doctor who can do it through your arm rather than your leg.

That way you are only immobilized for six hours instead of 24 afterward.

I didn't feel a thing, except where they insert the catheter and that just feels like getting an IV put in.

If there is blockage in your arteries, the cardiologist will determine whether to put in a stent or to refer you to heart bypass surgery - if there is a great deal of blockage.

If they put in a stent, you will have to take a medication to make your blood more slippery for the rest of your life so it doesn't catch on the stent and form a clot.

Luckily my results were very good so I didn't have to do anything further.

Best of luck to you.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
14. My sister went through several of them some years back.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 02:59 AM
Apr 2014

From what she said, it was somewhat unpleasant, but bearable. And the results were worth it.

Tell yourself: My doctor knows what she is doing. This is a procedure that is commonly done. It is one that makes life better. My life will be better. Any discomfort I feel is temporary. I will heal completely and easily. After this I will be healthier, and I will be able to live the life I want to have.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Have any of you undergone...