Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumFDA: No Immediate Risk Is Found From Arsenic Levels in Rice
Source: New York Times
No Immediate Risk Is Found From Arsenic Levels in Rice
By SABRINA TAVERNISE
Published: September 6, 2013
WASHINGTON The Food and Drug Administration announced Friday that it had found no evidence that current levels of arsenic in rice pose an immediate health risk.
The finding comes two months after the agency proposed new limits on arsenic in apple juice. A public outcry had caused the agency to look at the issue more closely.
The agency tested more than 1,300 types of rice and rice products, like rice cakes and infant cereals, and found that arsenic levels ranged from 3 to 7 micrograms per serving, amounts that the agency said were not hazardous to human health in the short term.
Most rice contains much higher levels of arsenic than apple juice does, said Keeve Nachman, a scientist who studies arsenic in food at the Center for a Livable Future at Johns Hopkins University, but because there is such a wide variety of products made with it, and because it is present at such different levels, the analysis for rice is more complicated.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By SABRINA TAVERNISE
Published: September 6, 2013
WASHINGTON The Food and Drug Administration announced Friday that it had found no evidence that current levels of arsenic in rice pose an immediate health risk.
The finding comes two months after the agency proposed new limits on arsenic in apple juice. A public outcry had caused the agency to look at the issue more closely.
The agency tested more than 1,300 types of rice and rice products, like rice cakes and infant cereals, and found that arsenic levels ranged from 3 to 7 micrograms per serving, amounts that the agency said were not hazardous to human health in the short term.
Most rice contains much higher levels of arsenic than apple juice does, said Keeve Nachman, a scientist who studies arsenic in food at the Center for a Livable Future at Johns Hopkins University, but because there is such a wide variety of products made with it, and because it is present at such different levels, the analysis for rice is more complicated.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/health/arsenic-levels-in-rice-products-not-a-health-risk-fda-says.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1098 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA: No Immediate Risk Is Found From Arsenic Levels in Rice (Original Post)
Eugene
Sep 2013
OP
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)1. From what I read on this, Ca, rice is cleaner than Louisiana rice
because of less soil contamination
and
brown rice tends to be much less exposed to arsenic
tho I don't know why that would be.
shit..is Nothing we eat safe anymore??
Tumbulu
(6,272 posts)2. It has to do with how much chicken litter
is used for fertilizer and how much of the land was once used for cotton. Cotton used to be defoliated with arsenic acid and they feed arsenic to conventional- NOT ORGANIC - chickens to get them to fatten up more quickly.
In N CA where the rice is grown there has not been any big cotton production and I do not think that the state of CA allows chickens to be fed arsenic, unlike some of the other big chicken producing states. But I am not sure about that.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)3. Ahhh....thank you for the memory re-boot.
I did not know chickens were FED arsenic....
now last night's chicken dinner is looking ugly....