Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appleannie1

(5,066 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:20 PM Aug 2013

Republican Sues to Keep Wife & Daughters From Accessing Birth Control

A (male, Republican, natch) Missouri state representative is suing the federal government for a personal family exemption from the Obamacare birth control mandate on the grounds that it violates his religious liberty. Since we can assume that this male Republican is not worried about blocking his own access to a pharmaceutical made for and taken exclusively by women, we can conclude that this guy is basically suing to keep his wife and daughters from having the option to access free birth control. I guess I missed that day in Catechism when we learned about how the Church believes that the man's religion gets to determine his wife and female offspring's insurance benefits.

To be fair, State Rep. Paul Wieland isn't alone in his lawsuit; joining him is his wife, Theresa. The pair claim that simply having the option to access copay-free birth control through Wieland's state-provided insurance plan violates their Catholic faith, which famously views birth control as basically punching God in the face (God, in his omnipotence, has yet to use his magic to overcome birth control nor is he able to make fetuses less abortable, but give him time. Angels in Godlab are working around the clock to overcome the simple inventions of the people God created). Wieland and his wife have three daughters, all of whom would be ostensibly blocked from accessing birth control if Paul and Theresa's dumbass lawsuit is successful. From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch,

“I see abortion-inducing drugs as intrinsically evil, and I cannot in good conscience preach one thing to my kids and then just go with the flow on our insurance,” said Rep. Wieland, who has three daughters. “This is a moral conundrum for me. Do I just cancel the coverage and put my family at risk? I don’t believe in what the government is doing.

http://jezebel.com/republican-sues-to-keep-wife-daughters-from-accessing-1148313604

I personally don't believe in birth control, therefore I should have the right to deny it to the world at large because I and only I count. The sheer arrogance is astounding.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican Sues to Keep Wife & Daughters From Accessing Birth Control (Original Post) appleannie1 Aug 2013 OP
God can bypass birth control ... see Virgin Mary for details. JoePhilly Aug 2013 #1
They should drop the insurance and know that God will take care Ilsa Aug 2013 #2
Okay. Wait Wut Aug 2013 #3
The SCOTUS ruled that fees related to Obamacare/ACA are a tax OmahaBlueDog Aug 2013 #7
Simple solution. Let Rep. Wieland resign and give up his state provided insurance. sinkingfeeling Aug 2013 #4
Now you're talkin'!!! MANative Aug 2013 #5
If you really think it's wrong, then don't use it. Even though you could. tanyev Aug 2013 #6

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
1. God can bypass birth control ... see Virgin Mary for details.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:23 PM
Aug 2013

If God wants you to have a baby ... YOU are having a baby.

Joseph could have been wearing 10 condoms, and Mary could have taken a fist full of birth control bills for years ... and she was having that baby anyway.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
2. They should drop the insurance and know that God will take care
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:28 PM
Aug 2013

of them for taking such a righteous stand!!!

Religious narcissism and misogyny run rampant in the GOP. It must be a plank in their platform.

What a bunch of arrogance. They can say "No" to accessing it, or drop their insurance and rely on God's benevolence.

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
3. Okay.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:29 PM
Aug 2013

Then I'm suing the United States because they allow churches to display crosses. The idea that Catholics tortured some guy and then decided much later that they wanted to worship him offends me. I should not be subjected to this kind of blatant disregard for my religious non-beliefs.

DISCLAIMER: I don't want to ban churches. Some of them are beautiful. Some are really freakin' hideous, too, but I don't have to look at them if I don't want to. Just like this idiot tool doesn't have to take birth control if he doesn't want to. It isn't going to magically materialize and pop itself into his mouth whenever he whips out his insurance card.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
7. The SCOTUS ruled that fees related to Obamacare/ACA are a tax
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 07:14 PM
Aug 2013

We didn't get to pick and choose about not paying taxes for the Iraq war. He shouldn't get to pick and choose the taxes he gets to pay.

tanyev

(42,540 posts)
6. If you really think it's wrong, then don't use it. Even though you could.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 04:17 PM
Aug 2013

There's your moral lesson, dumbass.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»Republican Sues to Keep W...